摘要
基于实体法规定和法解释学原理,侵权损害赔偿请求权的转让应予准许。对于具有财产给付性质的侵权之债,至少在下述几种情形下,应认可债权之受让人的适格原告资格:一是受让人与转让人和侵权人之间成立不真正连带之债;二是受让人与转让人均是同一群体性侵权纠纷中的受害人;三是除了上述两个情形之外,受让人提供了具备一定公信力的初步证据证明可能存在侵权之债。允许受让人提起侵权损害赔偿诉讼并以适用无独立请求权的第三人制度作为配套,有利于纠纷的一次性解决和诉讼经济。
Based on the substantive law and legal interpretative principles,the transfer of the right to claim damages for infringement should be permitted.For obligations in tort that involve the payment of property,the qualifications of a proper plaintiff of the assignee should be recognized at least in the following circumstances:an unreal joint and several liability are formed between the assignee and the assignor and the infringer;both the assignee and the assignor are victims in a collective dispute over tort;in addition to the above two circumstances,the assignee provides prima facie evidence with some credibility to prove the existence of the tort obligation.The practice of permitting a transferee to institute proceedings for infringement damages with the adoption of the third party system without independent claim is conducive to the one-off settlement of disputes and litigation economy.
作者
刘学在
赵天宇
LIU Xuezai;ZHAO Tianyu(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
出处
《河北工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第4期48-53,共6页
Journal of Hebei University of Technology：Social Sciences Edition
基金
2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目批准号17YJA820017)阶段性成果
国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心(教技函[2013]26号)的阶段性成果。
关键词
侵权之债
转让
诉的利益
原告资格
tort obligation
assignment
interest of litigation
plaintiff qualification
