期刊文献+

ASA-PS分级及其他术前评估系统在儿科麻醉实践中的争鸣 被引量:18

The debate on American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification and other preoperative evaluation systems in the practice of pediatric anesthesia
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国麻醉医师协会全身状态(American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status,ASA-PS)分级系统作为术前评估工具被广泛应用于成年人,但是否适用于小儿仍存在疑问。文章回顾了ASA-PS分级系统的历史沿革及其在成年人中的应用情况,介绍了ASA-PS分级系统在儿科应用中信度的研究,并分析其在儿科应用中信度不高的原因,还介绍了ASA-PS分级系统以外适用于儿科的术前风险评估系统。希望未来能建立针对儿科的术前评估系统或者对现有ASA-PS分级系统进行修订以适应儿科需要。 The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)Physical Status(ASA-PS)grading system is widely used as a preoperative evaluation tool in adults,but whether it is suitable for children is still a question.This article present the history of the ASA-PS and review the literature on its applicability to adults.This article also review the literature on the reliability of its usage in children and analyze the reasons why its credit is low in pediatric practice.New pediatric risk assessment systems are introduced as well.New grading system developed specifically for using in pediatrics,or modification for pediatrics of the existing adult physical status grading system is needed in the future.
作者 胡洁 白洁 Hu Jie;Bai Jie(Department of Anesthesiology,Shanghai Children's Medical Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China)
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2020年第10期986-990,共5页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词 美国麻醉医师协会全身状态分级系统 术前评估 风险评估 儿科 The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status grading system Preoperative evaluation Risk assessment Pediatrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1Welke KF, Karamlou T, Ungerleider RM, et al. Mortality rate is not a valid indicator of quality differences between pediatric cardiac surgical programs[J]. Ann Thorae Surg, 2010, 89(1): 139-144; discussion 145-146.
  • 2Bojan M, Gerelli S, Gioanni S, et al. The aristotle comprehensive complexity score predicts mortality and morbidity after congenital heart surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011, 91(4): 1214-1221.
  • 3Kang N, Cole T, Tsang V, et al. Risk stratification in paediatric open-heart surgery[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2004, 26( 1 ) : 3-11.
  • 4Kang N, Tsang VT, Elliott M J, et al. Does the aristotle score predict outcome in congenital heart surgery[J]? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006, 29(6): 986-988.
  • 5Larsen SH, Pedersen J, Jacobsen J, et al. The RACHS-1 risk categories reflect mortality and length of stay in a Danish population of children operated for congenital heart disease[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005, 28(6): 877-881.
  • 6Mildh L, Pettila V, Sairanen H, et al. Predictive value of paediatric risk of mortality score and risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score after paediatric open-heart surgery[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2007, 6(5): 628-631.
  • 7O'Brien SM, Jaeobs JP, Clarke DR, et al. Accuracy of the aristotle basic complexity score for classifying the mortality and morbidity potential of congenital heart surgery operations[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 84(6): 2027-2037, discussion 2027-2037.
  • 8Padley JR, Cole AD, Pye VE, et al. Five-year analysis of operative mortality and neonatal outcomes in congenital heart disease [J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2011, 20(7): 460-467.
  • 9Jenkins KJ, Ganvreau K, Newburger JW, et al. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2002, 123( 1 ) : 110-118.
  • 10Bojan M, Gerelli S, Gioanni S, et al. Comparative study of the aristotle comprehensive complexity and the risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery scores[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011, 92(3): 949-956.

共引文献21

同被引文献173

引证文献18

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部