摘要
较之司法实务,对破坏营商环境犯罪的刑事命题,基础理论研究与科学论证还远远不足。依据犯罪行为对"自由竞争的市场经济秩序"法益损害程度的不同,可将破坏营商环境犯罪类型化界分为三类情形,第一类是直接破坏型犯罪,第二类是间接破坏型犯罪,第三类是影响损害型犯罪。对破坏营商环境犯罪的基层治理应坚持系统化的思维,在明确法治化治理的基本要求和重要内容的基础上,构建打击破坏营商环境犯罪的基层联动机制,采取"三个治理时期"的阶段式推进模式,即早期"重在惩处"的打击期、中期"修复与保护一体化"的修复期与后期"长效坚持"的保持期。
Compared with judicial practice, relevant academic research and theoretical demonstrations of criminal justice propositions for crimes against business environment are far from enough. According to the extent of the damage to the legal interest of the freely competitive market economy order by criminal acts, crimes against business environment can be divided into three categories. The first one is the direct damage crime, the second one is indirect damage crime, and the third one is affects damage crime. On the basis of clarifying the basic requirements and important content of rule-of-law governance, grassroots governance of crimes against business environment should adhere to systemic thinking, establish a grassroots linkage mechanism to combat crimes against business environment, and adopt a phased promotion model of "three governance periods", namely, the early "emphasis on punishment" strike period, the mid-term "repair and protection integration" repair period and later "Long-term persistence" retention period.
作者
刘伟
Liu Wei(Criminal Judicial Law School of Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan Shandong 250014)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期149-160,共12页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
山东省法学会省级法学研究委托课题“平安山东视域下破坏企业营商环境犯罪治理问题”(SLS(2019)B11)的研究成果。
关键词
破坏营商环境犯罪
类型化处遇
治理策略
crimes against business environment
typed treatment
management strategy
