期刊文献+

16个高温高湿环境工况等级划分 被引量:5

Classification of 16 hot and humid environments
原文传递
导出
摘要 为深入探究高温高湿环境对人体产生的影响,利用环境舱模拟高温高湿环境并开展人体热应激试验,以获得试验数据。试验温度分别为34、36、38和40℃,相对湿度(RH)分别为60%、70%、80%和90%,综合口腔温度tc、心率(HR)、皮肤温度tsk3个生理参数和热感觉投票(TSV)、疲劳程度得分(FS)2个主观参数,提出综合生理指标F,根据各被试的F得分,应用聚类分析法对试验环境工况分类,用判别分析法建立判别函数确立分段界值。结果表明:由4个试验温度和4个相对湿度两两组合而成的16个高温高湿环境被分成了3类,此3类环境的F得分范围分别为28.14~39.76,39.17~45.21,44.13~52.39,将此3类环境划分为一般恶劣环境、中度恶劣环境和重度恶劣环境3个等级。 In order to explore influence of high temperature and high humidity environment on human body,such environment was simulated and heat stress experiment conducted by using environmental chamber to obtain data.With temperature for experiment at 34,36,38 and 40℃,Relative Humidity(RH)at 60%,70%,80%and 90%,a comprehensive physiological index F was proposed based on three physiological parameters which were oral temperature(tc),Heart Rate(HR),skin temperature(tsk)and two subjective parameters,Thermal Sensation Vote(TSV)and Fatigue Score(FS).Then,experimental working conditions were classified through cluster analysis according to Fscore for each subject,and discriminant function was built using discriminant analysis to establish segmentation threshold.The results show that 16 high temperature and high humidity environments are classified into three types whose range of F score is 28.14-39.76,39.17-45.21,44.13-52.39 respectively.And they can be defined as generally harsh environment,moderately harsh environment and severely harsh environment.
作者 张志宇 朱能 ZHANG Zhiyu;ZHU Neng(School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300350,China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期184-190,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(51378337)。
关键词 高温高湿环境 热应激 因子分析 聚类分析 等级划分 high temperature and high humidity environment heat stress factor analysis cluster analysis classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Kampmann B,Piekarski C.The evaluation of workplaces subjected to heat stress:can ISO 7933 (1989)adequately describe heat strain in industrial workplaces[J].Applied Ergonomics,2000,31:59-71.
  • 2Parsons K C.International standards for the assessment of the risk of thermal strain on clothed workers in hot environments[J].The Annals of Occupational Hygiene,1999,43:397-308.
  • 3International Organisation for Standardization.ISO7243 hot environments-estimation of the heat stress on working man,based on the WBGT-index (wet bulb globe temperature)[S].Geneva:ISO,1989.
  • 4International Organisation for Standardization.ISO7933 hot environments-analytical determination and interpretation of thermal stress using calculation of required sweat rate[S].Geneva:ISO,1989.
  • 5International Organisation for Standardization.ISO9886 evaluation of thermal strain by physiological measurements[S].Geneva:ISO,1992.
  • 6Forsthoff A,Neffgen H.The assessment of heat radiation[J].International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,1999,23:407-414.
  • 7Gagge A P.A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment[J].ASHRAE Trans,1986,92 (2):709-731.
  • 8Moran D S,Pandolf K B,Shapiro Y,et al.An environmental stress index(ESI) as a substitute for the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT)[J].Journal of Thermal Biology,2001,26:427-431.
  • 9Moran D S,Pandolf K B,Shapiro Y,et al.Evaluation of the environmental stress index for physiological variables[J].Journal of Thermal Biology,2003,28:43-49.
  • 10Lu Shilei,Zhu Neng.Physiological index study at the heat tolerance limits in China[J].Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate,2005(1):463-467.

共引文献29

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部