摘要
我国《电子商务法》和《侵权责任法》忽略"中立"要件,使所有的网络服务提供者均受到"避风港"规则中"知道"要件的检验,过度加重了网络服务提供者的责任,影响电子商务的繁荣和科技的进步。欧盟和美国均规定了"中立"作为责任承担的前置要件,对两者立法、司法的比较研究可提炼出"技术中立"和"地位中立"的明确标准。该标准结合我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》的规定,可解释现有"知道"规则,鼓励网络服务提供者保持"中立",承担合理的责任。"中立"前置要件的设立一方面可以遏制网络侵权的商业化泛滥,另一方面可以促进新商业模式的发展和新技术的应用。
Chinese E-Commerce Law and Tort Liability Law ignore the neutrality element so that all internet service providers are subject to the"knowing"requirement of the safe harbor rule,which excessively aggravates the internet service providers’responsibilities and further hinder the prosperity of technology and the E-commerce development.Both the European Union and the United States stipulate neutrality element as a prerequisite for eligibility,and the comparative study of the legislation and judiciary of the two can extract clear standards for"technology neutrality"and"status neutrality".The standards,combined with the provisions of China’s Regulations on the Protection of Information Network Transmission Rights,can explain the existing"knowing"requirement and encourage internet service providers to remain neutral and assume reasonable responsibility.The establishment of neutrality prerequisites can,on the one hand,curb the proliferation of the commercialization of online infringement,and on the other hand,promote the development of new business models and the application of new technologies.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期32-41,共10页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
中立要件
知道要件
避风港规则
网络服务提供者
网络侵权责任
neutrality element
knowing element
safe harbor rule
internet service providers
network tort liability
