期刊文献+

宫颈癌根治术后不放置盆腔引流可行性研究

Feasibility study of no tube drainage after radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈癌患者根治术后不放置盆腔引流对患者术后康复的影响。方法选择2018年5月~2019年5月因宫颈癌行腹腔镜下根治术治疗的患者36例,随机分为不放引流组16例,放置引流组20例。分别观察并比较患者术后病率、盆腔感染、腹胀、下肢深静脉血栓(LEDVT)、淋巴囊肿、尿潴留等并发症发生率、排气时间、术后住院天数。结果两组患者术后病率、淋巴囊肿、尿潴留、腹胀、盆腔感染、LEDVT等并发症发生率,差异均无显著性(P均>0.05);术后住院天数及术后排气时间比较,差异亦无显著性(P均>0.05)。结论宫颈癌患者根治术后,不放置盆腔引流不增加患者术后各种并发症的发生率,选择不放置盆腔引流是可行的。 Objective To explore the postoperative rehabilitation effect of no radical drainage in patients with cervical cancer radical hysterectomy.Methods A total of 36 patients with laparoscopic cervical cancer radical hysterectomy from May 2018 to May 2019 were randomly divided into no tube drainage group(n=16)and tube drainage group(n=20).The postoperative morbidity,pelvic infection,abdominal distension,lower extremity deep vein thrombosis(LEDVT),lymphatic cyst,urinary retention and other complications were observed and compared.Results No significant differences were found in these indicators above between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients received cervical cancer radical hysterectomy,the postoperative complications will not increase,so that it is feasible to choose not to place pelvic drainage.
作者 井明杰 张海凤 刘玉珍 王新波 吕秀萍 JING Mingjie;ZHANG Haifeng;LIU Yuzhen;WANG Xinbo;LV Xiuping(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261053,China;Department of Gynecology,the Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University)
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2020年第2期131-133,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 宫颈癌根治术 盆腔引流 术后病率 快速康复外科 Radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer Drainage Postoperative morbidity Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献47

  • 1伍晓汀,周勇.腹腔引流管的正确选择和合理应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(1):35-36. 被引量:95
  • 2戚世芳,付改玲,吴向晖,何涛,王焱.子宫颈癌根治术后盆腔淋巴囊肿25例分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(11):835-836. 被引量:22
  • 3成文采摘 蔡桂茹校.盆腔/主动脉旁淋巴结切除后淋巴囊肿和并发症取决于腹膜的关闭.国外医学:妇产科学分册,1995,22(1):54-54.
  • 4SUZUKI M, OHWADA M, SATO I. Pelvic lymphocysts following retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: Retroperitoneal partial “nonclosure” for ovarian and endometrial cancers [J]. J Surg Oncol,1998,68:149 -152.
  • 5MORICE P, LASSAU N, PAUTIER P, et al. Retroperitoneal drainage after complete para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: A randomized trial [J]. Obstetrics & Gynecolog, 2001,97 (2) :243-247.
  • 6FRANCHI M, GHEZZI F, ZANABONI F, et al. Nonclosure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: A randomized study [J]. Obstet Gynecot, 1997,90:622-627.
  • 7章子华.子宫颈癌(手术并发症的防治)[M]//.见:张志毅,章文华.现代妇科肿瘤外科学.北京:科学出版社,2003:113-115.
  • 8张志毅 周美惠 范建玄etal.二十年来手术治疗宫颈癌的经验[J].中华妇产科杂志,1987,22(1):9-9.
  • 9Disaia PJ.Invasive cervical cancer[M]//Disaia PJ,Creasman WT,eds.Clillical gynecologiconcology.6th St Louise Missnur,Mosby,2002:77-79.
  • 10TrimbosJB,Maas CP,Demiter MC,et a1.Anel'we-sparing Radicalhysterectomy.Guidelines and feasibility in Western patients[J].IntJ Gynecol Cancer,2001,1l(3):180-186.

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部