期刊文献+

IVIM DWI评价肝细胞癌特征及Gd-EOB-DTPA增强前后差异的研究 被引量:4

IVIM DWI Evaluating the Differences of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before and After Enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨正常肝组织、肝细胞癌Gd-EOB-DTPA(gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid,Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强前后低b值IVIM DWI双指数模型D~*、D、f值、单指数模型ADC值各参数特征,比较肿瘤组织与正常肝组织各参数的差别。方法 40例肝细胞癌且肝功能正常患者,肝细胞特异性对比剂Gd-EOB-DTPA增强扫描前及增强扫描后10min行低b值IVIM DWI检查(b值为0,20,40,60,80,100,200,400,600sec/mm^2),分析比较肿瘤组织增强前后、增强前肿瘤组织与正常肝组织IVIM DWI双指数模型D~*、D、f值,单指数模型ADC值(b值为0,200,400,600sec/mm^2)特征。增强前后正常肝组织、肿瘤组织不同参数的比较采用重复测量资料方差分析。肿瘤组织与正常肝组织各参数的比较采用单向方差分析。结果正常肝组织、肝细胞癌肿瘤组织Gd-EOB-DTPA增强前、增强后10min低b值IVIM DWI参数D~*、D、f值,单指数模型ADC值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。增强前后正常肝组织及肿瘤组织D值低于ADC值(P>0.05)。37例肝细胞癌肿瘤组织D值低于正常肝组织,3例肝细胞癌D值高于正常肝组织(P <0.05)。35例肝细胞癌肿瘤组织D~*值高于正常肝组织,5例肝细胞癌D~*值低于正常肝组织(P>0.05)。34例肝细胞癌肿瘤组织f值高于正常肝组织,6例肿瘤组织f值低于正常肝组织(P>0.05)。结论肝脏Gd-EOB-DTPA增强前后低b值IVIM DWI各参数差异无统计学意义,为优化检查方案、节省检查时间,可于Gd-EOB-DTPA增强后行肝脏低b值IVIM DWI检查。肝脏低b值IVIM DWI各参数有助于进一步评价肝细胞癌。 Objective To evaluate the D~*,D,f features of normal liver and HCC(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC) with low b values during before and after enhancement Gd-EOB-DTPA(gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid,Gd-EOB-DTPA),and to compare the differences of the normal liver and the tumor tissue.Methods 40 patients with HCC were included in this study between December 2011 and July 2013,all the patients with normal liver function,and all the patients underwent IVIM DWI(b value was 0,20,40,60,80,100,200,400,600sec/mm^2)examination before and 10 min after enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA,comparing the D~*,D,f,ADC(b value was 0,200,400,600sec/mm^2) features of normal liver and HCC before and after enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA.Analysis of variance repeated measures were performed in analyzing the differences of the parameters of different tissues before and after enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA.One-way analysis of variance was performed in analyzing the differences of the parameters between the normal liver tissue and tumor tissue.Results Before and 10min after enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA,the differences of ADC,D,D~*,f values between the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues were not significant (P>0.05).The D values of the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues were lower than the ADC values of the same tissues(P>0.05).The D values of the tumor tissues were lower than those of the normal liver tissues in 37 patients,the D values of the tumor tissues were higher than those of the normal liver tissues in 3 patients(P<0.05).The D~* values of the tumor tissues were higher than those of the normal liver tissues in 35 patients,the D values of the tumor tissues were lower than those of the normal liver tissues in 5 patients(P>0.05).The f values of the tumor tissues were higher than those of the normal liver tissues in 34 patients,the D values of the tumor tissues were lower than those of the normal liver tissues in 6 patients(P>0.05).Conclusion There were no significant differences of the parameter features of IVIM DWI with low b value between before and 10min after enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA,for the optimization of scanning proposal,and for saving the scanning time,IVIM DWI scan can be performed after 10min enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA.The parameter features of low b value IVIM DWI is useful for evaluating HCC.
作者 苏瑾 李景雷 赵心竹 刘于宝 SU Jin;LI Jing-lei;ZHAO Xin-zhu(Department of Radiology,Shenzhen Hospital,Southern Medical University,Shenzhen 518101,Guangdong Province,China)
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2020年第9期110-113,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 肝细胞癌 钆乙氧基苯甲基二乙烯五胺乙酸 磁共振成像 体素内不相干运动 扩散加权成像 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid Magnetic Resonance Imaging Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weight Imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Stefano Palmucci,Letizia Antonella Mauro,Martina Messina,Brunella Russo,Giovanni Failla,Pietro Milone,Massimiliano Berretta,Giovanni Carlo Ettorre.Diffusion-weighted MRI in a liver protocol: Its role in focal lesion detection[J].World Journal of Radiology,2012,4(7):302-310. 被引量:12
  • 2Hussain SM,Semelka RC. Hepatic imaging : comparison ofmodalities. Radiol Clin North Am,2005 ,43 :929-947.
  • 3Koinuma M, Ohashi I,Hanafusa K,et al. Apparent diffusioncoefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magneticresonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. J Magn ResonImaging,2005 ,22 :80-85.
  • 4Annet L, Peeters F, Abarca-Quinones J, et al. Assessment ofdiffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis. J Magn ResonImaging,2007,25 :122-128.
  • 5Girometti R, Furlan A,Bazzocchi M,et al. Diffusion-weighted MRIin evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhoticpatients. Radiol Med ,2007,112 :394408.
  • 6Asbach P,Hein PA,Stemmer A,et al. Free-breathing echo-planarimaging based diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging ofthe liver with prospective acquisition correction. J Comput AssistTomogr,2008,32 :372-378.
  • 7Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A,Boelle PY, et al. Diffusion-weightedmagnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis inchronic hepatitis C. Hepatology ,2007 ,46 :658-665.
  • 8Roth Y, Tichler T, Kostenich G, et al. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for pretreatment prediction and earlymonitoring of tumor response to therapy in mice. Radiology, 2004,232:685-692.
  • 9Do RK, Chandarana H, Felker E, et al. Diagnosis of liver fibrosisand cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging : value of normalizedapparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as referenceorgan. AJR Am J Roentgenol ,2010,195 : 671-676.
  • 10Anderson SW, Jara H, Ozonoff A, et al. Effect of diseaseprogression on liver apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 values ina murine model of hepatic fibrosis at 11.7 Tesla MRI. J MagnReson Imaging ,2012,35 : 140-146.

共引文献32

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部