摘要
通过对《中药新药临床研究指导原则》《中医病证诊断疗效标准》,第五、六、七版统编教材《中医内科学》和学术界对心律失常辨证构成的比较分析,发现在权威文献之间、学术界之间、权威文献与学术界之间的辨证差异较大,文章对存在的诸多问题进行分析,并提出解决这一问题的基本思路与方法。
Through the comparative analysis of the Guidelines for Clinical Research of New Drugs in Traditional Chinese Medicine,Diagnostic and Efficacy Standards for TCM Syndrome,the 5,6,and 7 edition of the textbook Internal Medicine of Chinese Medicine and the academic community on the composition of syndrome differentiation of arrhythmia,it is found that there are great differences in syndrome differentiation between authoritative literature,academic circles,authoritative literatures and academic circles.The paper analyzed many problems and proposed the basic ideas and methods to solve this problem.
作者
翟颖
刘淑荣
李立新
梁茂新
于清华
ZHAI Ying;LIU Shu-rong;LI Li-xin;LIANG Mao-xin;YU Qing-hua(Jilin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changchun 130021,China;Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shenyang 110032,China)
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第7期3313-3316,共4页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
吉林省科技发展计划项目(No.20170101008JC)。
关键词
心律失常
心悸
辨证规范
问题
对策
Arrhythmia
Palpitations
Syndrome differentiation norms
Problems
Countermeasures
