期刊文献+

调整刑事责任年龄之否定--兼论青少年犯罪行为的惩戒 被引量:1

The Negation of Adjusting the Age of Criminal Responsibility--Also on the Punishment of Juvenile Delinquency
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于我国是否应当降低刑事责任年龄一直存在争议,当下随着青少年恶性事件频发,相应的教育、惩治体系缺位,降低刑事责任年龄的呼声日高。目前,面对未满14岁青少年实施的严重犯罪,教育、惩治青少年犯罪的主要法律阻碍是围绕刑事责任年龄为核心的一系列规范性法律文件之规定,故有人提出了修改刑事责任年龄或引入恶意补足年龄规定等主张,但这些举措并不宜用来解决我国社会转型过程中出现的青少年犯罪的问题,而是应当合理运用《未成年保护法》《预防未成年人犯罪法》等其他法律,系统化的解决问题。同时,在以刑事手段教育、惩治青少年犯罪之外,还有另一类"工读学校"更值得关注。 There has been controversy as to whether China should lower the age of criminal responsibility.With the frequent occurrence of adolescent vicious incidents,the corresponding education and punishment system is absent,and the demand for lowering the age of criminal responsibility is increasing.At present,in the face of serious crimes committed by young people under the age of 14,the main legal obstacles to education and punishment of young people’s crimes are the provisions of a series of normative legal documents around the age of criminal responsibility,so some people have proposed to modify the age of criminal responsibility or introduce Advocate for making up for age regulations and other claims maliciously,but these measures should not be used to solve the problem of juvenile delinquency in the process of social transformation in our country,but other laws such as the Law on the Protection of Minors and the Law on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency are applied to solve problems systematically.At the same time,in addition to the use of criminal means to educate and punish juvenile delinquency,there is another type of "work school" that deserves more attention.
作者 曾哲彪 ZENG Zhe-biao(Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《牡丹江大学学报》 2020年第8期40-45,共6页 Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词 青少年犯罪 刑事责任年龄 工读学校 juvenile delinquency age of criminal responsibility work school
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献67

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部