摘要
目的比较乳腺癌患者采用静脉输液港与经外周置入中心静脉导管的并发症情况及健康促进行为,为采取措施促进患者健康提供参考。方法以接受静脉输液港的135例与经外周置入中心静脉导管的278例乳腺癌患者为对象,记录两组置管后6个月内患者的并发症情况,并采用健康促进生活方式量表进行问卷调查。结果静脉输液港组与经外周置入中心静脉导管组比较,并发症发生率显著降低,健康促进行为评分显著提高(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论乳腺癌患者静脉输液港置管与经外周置入中心静脉导管相比,并发症少、健康促进行为好。针对经外周置入中心静脉导管置管的乳腺癌患者应给予更多关注,使其建立良好的健康促进行为。
Objective To compare complications and health-promoting behaviors between venous access port(VAP)and peripherally inserted central venous catheter(PICC)in breast cancer patients,thus to provide reference for taking measures to promote health of patients.Methods A total of 135 breast cancer patients who received VAP and 278 patients who placed with PICC were studied.Complications were recorded within 6 months of catheterization,and the Health Promotion Lifestyle Scale(HPLP)was used for questionnaire survey.Results Patients with VAP had lower incidence rate of complications and higher score of health-promoting behaviors compared with their counterparts with PICC(P<0.05,P<0.01).Conclusion Compared with PICC,VAP leads to fewer complications and better health-promoting behaviors in breast cancer patients.Breast cancer patients with PICC should be paid more attention to,thus to help them adopt healthy behaviors.
作者
陈静
彭昕
Chen Jing;Peng Xin(Cancer Center,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China)
出处
《护理学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第13期37-40,共4页
Journal of Nursing Science
关键词
乳腺癌
静脉输液港
经外周置入中心静脉导管
并发症
健康促进行为
breast cancer
venous access port
peripherally inserted central venous catheter
complication
health-promoting behavior
