期刊文献+

SMILE手术中角膜切削厚度精确性的研究 被引量:2

Precision of corneal ablation thickness in SMILE
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估不同程度近视患者SMILE术前预估角膜切削厚度与术后实际角膜切削厚度的差异,探究SMILE术中角膜基质切削厚度的精确性。方法:前瞻性研究。收集2017-01/2019-08在我院行SMILE手术的近视患者143例234眼,根据术前等效球镜度分为低(-0.50^-3.00D,78眼)、中(>-3.00^-6.00D,78眼)、高(>-6.00D,78眼)度近视组,观察三组患者手术前后视力和等效球镜度,并分别于术前和术后1mo采用Pentacam眼前节综合分析系统测量中央角膜厚度,比较术前预估角膜切削厚度与术后1mo实际切削厚度的差异,探讨SMILE术中不同屈光状态角膜基质切削厚度的精确性。结果:术后1mo,所有患眼裸眼视力均达0.8以上,98.3%患眼裸眼视力达1.0以上。所有患者术后1mo角膜平均实际切削厚度低于平均预估切削厚度(84.92±23.15μm vs 100.07±26.83μm,P<0.01),平均切削差异值为15.15±10.34μm。低、中、高度近视组患者角膜实际切削厚度均低于各组预估角膜切削厚度(P<0.01),切削差异值分别为8.81±7.78、15.59±9.27、21.05±10.03μm。术前,本研究纳入患者平均等效球镜度为-4.85±2.15D,术前等效球镜度与切削差异值之间具有直线回归关系(Y=-2.2495X+3.9287,R^2=0.1589),等效球镜度数越大,切削差异值越大(t=-6.620,P<0.001)。结论:SMILE手术的角膜基质实际切削厚度低于预估切削厚度,且近视度数越高,切削差异越大,但术后屈光矫正效果理想,术中角膜切削厚度的差异并不影响屈光矫正手术的精确性。 ·AIM:To evaluate the differences between the estimated and measured corneal ablation thickness in myopic eyes with different refractive errors in small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)and investigate the precision of corneal ablation thickness in SMILE.·METHODS:This prospective study included 234 eyes(143 myopic patients),who had undergone SMILE in our hospital from January 2017 to August 2019.The patients were divided into three groups according to a manifest refraction spherical equivalent(MRSE):low myopia(-0.50 to-3.00D,78 eyes),moderate myopia(>-3.00 to-6.00D,78 eyes),and high myopia(>-6.00D,78 eyes).Observe the uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA)and MRSE before and after operation.The central corneal thickness(CCT)was measured by Pentacam preoperatively and postoperatively at 1mo.Compare the discrepancy between estimated corneal ablation thickness and measured corneal ablation thickness of three groups to discuss the precision of corneal ablation thickness in different refractive errors in SMILE.·RESULTS:The UDVA was 0.8 or better in all eyes and 1.0 or better in 98.3%eyes postoperatively.The average measured corneal ablation thickness was significantly lower than average estimated corneal ablation thickness(84.92±23.15μm vs 100.07±26.83μm,P<0.01).The average cutting error was 15.15±10.34μm.The measured corneal ablation thickness of low myopia,moderate myopia and high myopia was significantly lower than the estimated corneal ablation thickness,respectively(P<0.01).The cutting error of low myopia,moderate myopia and high myopia was 8.81±7.78,15.59±9.27,21.05±10.03μm respectively.The average MRSE of all patients was-4.85±2.15D preoperation,there was a linear regression relation between MRSE and cutting error(Y=-2.2495X+3.9287,R^2=0.1589).The cutting error increased with MRSE(t=-6.620,P<0.001).·CONCLUSION:The measured corneal ablation thickness was lower than estimated corneal ablation thickness,the higher the refractive power was,the larger the cutting error would be in SMILE.Although there was significant discrepancy between measured corneal ablation thickness and estimated corneal ablation thickness,the effect of this surgery was ideal,the mismatch did not influence the precision of different refractive errors.
作者 刘银 江文珊 Yin Liu;Wen-Shan Jiang(Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China)
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第8期1413-1417,共5页 International Eye Science
关键词 近视 SMILE 角膜基质 切削差异 精确性 myopia SMILE corneal stroma cutting error precision
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1李凤鸣.中华眼科学下册第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.2592.
  • 2Seiler T,Koufala K,Richter G.Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ,keratomileusis.J Refract Surg 1998;14:312-317.
  • 3Magallanes R,Shah S,Zadok D,et al.Stability after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderately and extremly myopia eyes.J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27(7):1007-1012.
  • 4Pan Q,Gu YS,Wang J,et al.Differences between regressive and non-regressive eyes after LASIK for myopia in the time course of corneal changes assessed with the Orbscan.Ophthalmologica 2004;218(2):96-101.
  • 5Chayet AS,Assil KK,Montes M,et al.Regression and its mechanism after laser in situ keratomileusis inmoderate and highmyopia.Ophthalmology 1998;105(7):1194-1199.
  • 6王雁,赵堪兴.波前像差与临床视觉矫正[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:41.
  • 7Mello GR, Rocha KM, Santhiago MR, et al. Applications of wavefront technology[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2012,38(9): 1671-1683.
  • 8Mok KH, Lee VW. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations[J]. J Refract Surg,2005,21 (2) : 141-143.
  • 9Seo KY, Lee JB, Kang JJ, et al. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after LASEK with a 6.0 mm ablation zone and a 6.5 mm ablation zone with blend zone[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004,30 (3) : 653-657.
  • 10Artal P, Fern6ndez E J, Manzanera S. Are optical aberrations during accommodation a significant problem for refractive surgery?[J]. J Refract Surg,2002,18(5):S563-566.

共引文献22

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部