期刊文献+

Comparison of modeling methods for wind power prediction:a critical study 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 Prediction of power generation of a wind turbine is crucial,which calls for accurate and reliable models.In this work,six different models have been developed based on wind power equation,concept of power curve,response surface methodology(RSM)and artificial neural network(ANN),and the results have been compared.To develop the models based on the concept of power curve,the manufacturer’s power curve,and to develop RSM as well as ANN models,the data collected from supervisory control and data acquisition(SCADA)of a 1.5 MW turbine have been used.In addition to wind speed,the air density,blade pitch angle,rotor speed and wind direction have been considered as input variables for RSM and ANN models.Proper selection of input variables and capability of ANN to map input-output relationships have resulted in an accurate model for wind power prediction in comparison to other methods.
出处 《Frontiers in Energy》 SCIE CSCD 2020年第2期347-358,共12页 能源前沿(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献111

  • 1Central Electricity Authority. Load generation balance report (2013-14)[OL].www.cea.nic.in/reports/yearly/lgbr_report.pdf,2013.
  • 2Bhushan B. ABC of ABT—A primer on availability tariff[OL].http://nrldc.org/docs/documents/Articles/abc_abt.pdf,2013.
  • 3Sharma S,Parekh B R. Implementation of ABT (availability based tariff) —its treatment & proceedings[OL].http://vww.bvmengineering.ac.in/doc s/published%20papers/electrical/elctrical/301063.pdf,2013.
  • 4Holmukbe R M,Pawar Y,Desai R S,Hasarmani T S. Availability based tariff and its impact on different industry players—a review[A].West Bengal,India,2010.
  • 5Soonee S K,Narasimhan S K,Pandey V. Significance of unscheduled interchange mechanism in the Indian electricity supply industry[A].Minneapolis,USA,2006.
  • 6Senjyu T,Shimabukuro K,Uezato K,Funabashi T. A fast technique for unit commitment problem by extended priority list[J].{H}IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2003,(02):882-888.doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2003.811000.
  • 7Pang C K,Sheble G B,Albuyeh F. Evaluation of dynamic programming based methods and multiple area representation for thermal unit commitments[J].{H}IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems,1981,(03):1212-1218.
  • 8Park J H,Kim S K,Park G P,Yoon Y T,Lee S S. Modified dynamic programming based unit commitment technique[A].Minneapolis,USA,2010.1-7.
  • 9Cheng C P,Liu C W,Liu C C. Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms[J].{H}IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2000,(02):707-714.doi:10.1109/59.867163.
  • 10Simopoulos D N,Kavatza S D,Vournas C D. Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm[J].{H}IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2006,(01):68-76.doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2005.860922.

共引文献12

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部