期刊文献+

不同微创介入法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效对比观察 被引量:1

A comparative study on the efficacy of different minimally invasive interventional methodsin the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察应用不同微创介入法治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床效果。方法:选取2016年10~2018年10月期间收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者243例,按随机数字表法分为A组(单纯后回路)、B组(侧后路)、C组(后路联合侧路)各81例,观察其临床疗效。结果:C组的VAS显著低于A、B组,JOA评分及临床优良率显著高于A、B组(P<0.05);A、B组间各项指标无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:后路联合侧路注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效显著,较单纯应用侧路或者后路治疗效果更佳,值得推广应用。 Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of different minimally invasive interventional methods in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods:243 cases of lumbar disc herniation were collected and randomly divided into group A(simple posterior circuit),group B(lateral posterior pathway)and group C(combined posterior lateral pathway)with 81 cases in each group.Results:V A S in group C was significantly lower than that in group A and B,JO A score and clinical excellence rate were significantly higher than those in group A and B(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between groups A and B(P>0.05).Conclusion:Posterior approach combined with lateral route injection is more effective in treating lumbar disc herniation than lateral or posterior route alone.It is worth popularizing and applying.
作者 李达春 邹耀 黄凯 LI Da-chun;ZOU Yao;HUANG Kai(College of Physical Education and Healths YuLin Normal University;Department of Orthopedics,Guinan Hospital,Yulin Guangxi 537000,China)
出处 《微量元素与健康研究》 CAS 2020年第4期23-25,共3页 Studies of Trace Elements and Health
关键词 腰椎间盘突出 微创技术 疗效 Protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc Minimally invasive technique Therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献76

共引文献101

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部