期刊文献+

经皮内镜下Key-Hole技术治疗旁中央型颈椎间盘突出症 被引量:16

Percutaneous endoscopic Key-Hole technology for treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经皮内镜下颈后路Key-Hole开窗减压髓核摘除术治疗旁中央型颈椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法2015年12月—2018年10月,应用经皮内镜下颈后路Key-Hole开窗减压髓核摘除术治疗旁中央型颈椎间盘突出症患者29例。男16例,女13例;年龄39~78岁,平均49.7岁。病程3.5~15.0个月,平均6.2个月。病变节段:C3、42例,C4、55例,C5、69例,C6、712例,C7、T11例。患者以神经根性症状为主。记录手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及手术并发症,采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、Macnab疗效评价标准以及颈椎活动度(range of motion,ROM)、手术节段稳定性来评估手术疗效及安全性。结果患者均获随访,随访时间11~43个月,平均19.4个月。手术时间67~89 min,平均73.3 min;术中出血量18~30 mL,平均22.9 mL;住院时间5~10 d,平均7.3 d。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。术后出现1例患肢触觉减退、痛觉过敏,1例四肢肌力下降。术后各时间点VAS评分及JOA评分均较术前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后各时间点间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时,按照Macnab评定标准评价疗效,获优11例、良15例、可2例、差1例,优良率为89.7%。CT、MRI复查显示椎管及神经根管充分减压;颈椎屈伸动力位X线片测量颈椎ROM手术前后差异无统计学意义(t=1.427,P=0.165),均未出现手术节段失稳情况。结论对于同时压迫神经根和脊髓的旁中央型颈椎间盘突出症,经皮内镜下颈后路Key-Hole开窗减压髓核摘除术具有创伤小、恢复快、疗效满意等优点,可作为一种安全、有效的微创术式。 Objective To investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation in the treatment of paracentral cervical disc herniation.Methods Between December 2015 and October 2018,29 cases of paracentral cervical disc herniation were treated with percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation.There were 16 males and 13 females,with an average age of 49.7 years(range,39-78 years).The disease duration was 3.5-15.0 months(mean,6.2 months).The herniated disc located at C3,4 in 2 cases,C4,5 in 5 cases,C5,6 in 9 cases,C6,7 in 12 cases,and C7,T1 in 1 case.The main symptoms were radiculopathy symptom.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,and complications were observed and recorded.Visual analogue scale(VAS)score,Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score,cervical range of motion(ROM),Macnab standard,and cervical segment stability were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the operation.Results All patients were followed up 11-43 months,with an average of19.4 months.The operation time was 67-89 minutes(mean,73.3 minutes);the intraoperative blood loss was 18-30 mL(mean,22.9 mL);the hospital stay was 5-10 days(mean,7.3 days).All the incisions healed by first intention.There was1 case of hypodynia and hyperalgesia in the affected limb after operation,1 case of decreased limb muscle strength.The VAS scores and JOA scores at each time point after operation were superior to those before operation(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the time points after operation(P>0.05).At last follow-up,the effectiveness was rated according to the Macnab standard as excellent in 11 cases,good in 15 cases,fair in 2 cases,and bad in 1 case,with an excellent and good rate of 89.7%.The CT and MRI showed the decompression of spinal canal and nerve canal.There was no significant difference in cervical ROM between pre-and post-operation(t=1.427,P=0.165),and no surgical segment instability occurred by X-ray films of flexion and extension of cervical vertebrae.Conclusion For the paracentral cervical disc herniation with simultaneous compression of nerve roots and spinal cord,percutaneous endoscopic posterior cervical Key-Hole fenestration decompression and nucleus pulposus extirpation has the advantages of small trauma,quick recovery,and satisfactory effectiveness,and can be used as a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure.
作者 刘国萍 曹奇 唐国军 张洁 LIU Guoping;CAO Qi;TANG Guojun;ZHANG Jie(Department of Spinal Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China,Hengyang Hunan,421000,P.R.China)
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第7期895-899,共5页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 颈椎间盘突出症 旁中央型 颈椎后路 脊柱内镜 Key-Hole技术 Cervical disc herniation paracentral type posterior cervical spine approach spinal endoscope Key-Hole technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献65

  • 1罗刚,李长青,腾海军,周跃.单节段腰椎小关节分级切除对腰椎稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2005,27(18):1871-1873. 被引量:23
  • 2Sebastian R,Martin K,Harry M. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy[J].{H}Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques,2009,(02):122-129.
  • 3Schoeggl A,Maier H,Saringer W,et a1. Outcome after chronic sciatica as the only reason for lumar micodiscectomy[J].{H}Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques,2002,(05):415-419.
  • 4Ruenen S,Meyer O,Godoli G. Epiduroscopic diagnosis and treatment of epidural adhesions in chronic back pain syndrome of patients with previous surgical treatment:first results of 31 interventions[J].Z 0rthop Ihre Grenzgeb,2002.17l-175.
  • 5Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopy and discectomy:state of the art[J].{H}Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine,2000,(04):327-332.
  • 6Yeung AT,Tsou PM. Postprolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation:surgical technique,outcome,and complications in 307 consecutive cases[J].{H}SPINE,2002,(07):722-731.
  • 7Jorm N,Raymond O,Ronald B. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations:a systematic review of the literature[J].Eur Spine,2010.181-204.
  • 8Yasargil MG. Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc[J].Adv Neurosurg,1977.81-82.
  • 9Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach[J].Adv Neurosurg,1977.74-80.
  • 10Koebbe CJ,Maroon JC,Abla A. Lumbar microdisc-ectomy:a historical perspective and current technical considerations[J].Neurosurg Focus,2002,(02):E3.

共引文献109

同被引文献116

引证文献16

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部