摘要
20世纪50年代起,史学界发生过一场关于《大同书》成书年代及其思想实质的论争,虽然波及范围不广,但持续时间长久,备受学术界关注。汤志钧先生不迷惑于康有为的自述,不信从学者的不同论说,而是从诸多著述、诗文、记述中去挖掘,去钩稽,去探究,确定康有为在"倒填年月"。即便是在学术界展开辩论,莫可端倪,自己处于"少数"时,也不随波逐流、人云亦云,而是相信考证、辨析的科学性和合理性,始终不变观点,直至上海和天津深藏的《大同书》手稿被发现。
Since the 1950 s,there has been a controversy about the finishing date of Kang Youwei’s Book of Great Harmony and its intellectual essence.Although the controversy has not been spread widely,it has lasted for a long time.According to Kang’s own narrative,the work was written in the 1880 s.However,after a careful study of Kang’s intellectual development,Tang Zhijun argued that it must have been written in1901 and 1902 when Kang was in India.Tang’s argument was challenged by Li Zehou and others.In the late 1970 s and early 1980 s,the manuscripts of Book of Great Harmony was found in Shanghai and Tianjin,which proved that it was indeed written in 1901 and 1902.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期204-218,222,共16页
Historical Review
