摘要
口述档案及其相关的口述历史与口述传统概念产生的档案身份之争触及档案学基础理论,并已陷入困境。要摆脱困境,只能在否定其档案身份与基础理论革命之间做出选择。厘清混淆的概念,区分口述历史与口述传统,有助于认清三个档案时代:基于口头传统的前档案时代、基于文字的传统档案时代和基于声像与数字技术的后档案时代,以及后档案时代学理革命的必要性。纪录档案观可在口述档案特性分析基础上解释新型档案活动和传统文字档案中的理论问题,并以新的角度重新阐释档案学史上的不同理论。
The dispute between oral archives and its related concepts such as oral history and oral tradition has touched on the basic theory of archival science,and has fallen into a dilemma.To get out of the dilemma,we can only choose between denying its archival identity and the revolution of the basic theory.Clarifying the concept and distinguishing oral history from oral tradition can help us understand three archival eras:pre-archival era based on oral tradition,traditional archival era based on literacy and post-archival era based on audio-visual and digital technology and the significance of the theoretical revolution in the post-archive era.Based on the analysis of the characteristics of oral archives,documenting archival theory can explain the theoretical problems in the new type of archival activities and traditional written archives,and reinterpret different theories in the history of archival science from a new angle.
作者
张锦
ZHANG Jin(China Film&Archive China Film Art Research Center,Beijing 100082,China)
出处
《档案学通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期20-28,共9页
Archives Science Bulletin
关键词
口述档案
口述历史
口述传统
后档案时代
纪录档案观
Oral archives
Oral history
Oral tradition
Post-archival Era
Documenting archival theory
