摘要
无效固定价合同的履行形态多样。法院对相关结算争议的审理多依据《合同法》和《建设工程司法解释(一)》中的部分条文,但裁判结果并不统一。为了解决实务适用难题,地方各高院亦争相出台关于各施工形态下价款结算的文件,但多各依各据,难致同案同判,有损法律之公平和权威。统一的裁判规则亟待确立。在固定价合同无效时,对于工程完工并经验收合格或实际使用、工程仅部分完工、出现工程增量等情形,宜应首选依据合同约定进行价款结算;在原材料价格大幅变动且当事人对此无约定时同于前理;而对于多份合同皆无效的情形,则应根据《建设工程司法解释(二)》11条确定结算依据。
The performance forms of invalid fixed price contracts are diverse.The courts’trials of related settlement disputes are mostly based on some provisions of the Contract Law and the Judicial Interpretation of Construction Projects(I),but the judgment results are not uniform.In order to solve the problem of practical application,the local high courts have also rushed to issue documents on settlement of prices under various construction forms,however,it is difficult to judge the same case with the same basis,which is detrimental to the fairness and authority of the law.It is urgent to establish uniform rules of adjudication.In the case that the fixed price contract is invalid,for projects that are completed and pass acceptance inspection or are actually used,uncompleted projects,and project increments,it should be preferred to settle the price according to the contract;when the price of raw materials changes significantly and the parties do not agree on this situation,it is the same as before;in the case that multiple contracts are invalid,the settlement basis shall be determined in accordance with article 11 of the Judicial Interpretation of Construction Engineering(II).
作者
高清浅
GAO Qingqian(School of Civil and Commercial Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《黑龙江工程学院学报》
CAS
2020年第3期56-60,共5页
Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Technology
关键词
固定价
合同无效
价款结算
未完工
工程增量
原材料价格
fixed price
invalid contract
payment settlement
unfinished project increment
raw material price
