摘要
目的:探讨牙齿缺失患者行常规种植和即刻种植修复后的临床效果。方法:选择笔者医院2017年3月-2018年9月收治的118例牙齿缺失患者,根据治疗方法和种植情况分为常规种植组和即刻种植组。常规种植组:62例,给予常规种植进行治疗;即刻种植组:56例,给予即刻种植进行治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效,观察两组修复后牙槽骨及种植体周围情况。结果:两组治疗后,常规种植组总有效率为100%,即刻种植组总有效率为100%,两组差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);常规种植组PES得分(12.3±3.32)分,即刻种植组为(11.8±3.19)分,两组比较差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);牙槽骨吸收情况:常规种植组总体吸收程度1.14±0.58,即刻种植组为0.94±0.42,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);常规种植组的临床总满意率88.71%,明显低于即刻种植组的98.21%,两组比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(χ^2=2.05,P=0.04)。结论:常规种植和即刻种植对牙齿缺失进行修复的临床疗效相似,安全性均较高,但相对而言即刻种植可降低牙槽骨吸收,提高患者满意度,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To explore the clinical effects of routine implants and immediate implant repair in patients with missing teeth.Methods 118 patients with tooth loss who were admitted to our hospital from March 2017 to September 2018 were selected.According to the treatment method and planting situation,they were divided into the conventional planting group and the immediate planting group,and the conventional planting group was treated with conventional planting.56 patients in the planting group were given immediate treatment for treatment.The clinical effi cacy of the two groups of patients was compared,and the effects of alveolar bone and implants around the two groups were observed.Results After treatment,the total effective rate was 100%in the conventional planting group and 100%in the immediate planting group.The difference between the two groups was not statistically signifi cant(P>0.05).The PES score of the conventional planting group was 12.3±3.32,planted immediately.The group was 11.8±3.19.The difference between the two groups was not statistically signifi cant(P>0.05).The alveolar bone resorption rate was 1.14±0.58 in the conventional implant group and 0.94±0.42 in the immediate implant group.Statistical signifi cance(P<0.05).The clinical total satisfaction rate of the conventional implantation group was 88.71%,which was signifi cantly lower than the clinical total satisfaction rate of the immediate implantation group 98.21%.The difference between the two groups was signifi cant.Statistical signifi cance(χ^2=2.05,P=0.04).Conclusion Conventional planting and immediate planting have similar clinical effects on dental implants,and the safety is higher.However,immediate planting can reduce alveolar bone resorption and improve patient satisfaction,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者
蔡剑
唐伟成
孙丽君
束为
CAI Jian;TANG Wei-cheng;SUN Li-jun;SHU Wei(Department of Stomatology,Jiangsu Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu,China)
出处
《中国美容医学》
CAS
2020年第5期127-130,共4页
Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词
牙齿缺失
常规种植
即刻种植
牙槽骨
满意度
missing teeth
routine implantation
immediate implantation
alveolar bone
satisfaction
