期刊文献+

3D腹腔镜下前列腺根治性术治疗对前列腺癌患者围术期指标、术后尿控恢复、切缘阳性率的影响 被引量:9

The effects of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on perioperative indexes,postoperative urinary control recovery and positive rate of incisal margin in patients with prostatic cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨三维(3D)腹腔镜下前列腺根治性术治疗对前列腺癌患者围术期指标、术后尿控恢复、切缘阳性率的影响。方法我院收治的前列腺患者80例,按照手术方式分为3D腹腔镜术组(43例)和2D腹腔镜术组(37例),两组术后均接受3个月随访。对比两组术前术后膜部尿道长度(MUL)差值、手术时间、术中出血量、膀胱颈-尿道吻合时间、住院时间、拔除导管后2、8、12、24周尿控恢复情况、术后切缘阳性率及保留勃起功能成功率。结果治疗后3D腹腔镜术组手术时间、术中出血量、膀胱颈-尿道吻合时间及住院时间短于2D腹腔镜术组,术前术后MUL差值小于2D腹腔镜术组,拔除导管后8、12周控尿率高于2D腹腔镜术组,保留勃起功能成功率高于2D腹腔镜术组(P<0.05),切缘阳性率与2D腹腔镜术组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论3D腹腔镜下前列腺根治性术治疗前列腺可明显缩短手术时间、术中出血量、膀胱颈-尿道吻合时间及住院时间,切缘阳性率低,且保留勃起功能成功率较高,有助于早期控尿功能的恢复。 Objective To explore the effects of three-dimensional(3 D)laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on perioperative indexes,postoperative urinary control recovery and positive of incisal margin of patients with prostatic cancer.Methods Eighty patients with prostatic cancer in our hospital were divided into 3 D laparoscopic surgery group(n=43)and 2 D laparoscopic surgery group(n=37)according to the surgical procedures.The patients were followed up for 3 months after operation.The difference of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length(MUL),operative time,intraoperative blood loss,bladder neck-urethral anastomosis time,hospital stay,urinary control recovery before and after 2,8,12,and 24 weeks after catheter removal,the positive rate of postoperative margin and the success rate of erectile function retention were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,bladder neck-urethral anastomosis time and hospital stay in the 3 D laparoscopic surgery group were shorter or less than those in the 2 D laparoscopic surgery group(P<0.05).The difference of preoperative and postoperative MUL was significantly less in the 3 D laparoscopic surgery group than that in the 2 D laparoscopic surgery group(P<0.05).The urinary control rate after 8 and 12 weeks of catheter removal was higher in the 3 D laparoscopic surgery group than that in 2 D laparoscopic surgery group(P<0.05).The success rate of erectile function retention in the 3 D laparoscopic surgery group was higher than that in 2 D laparoscopic surgery group(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in positive rate of margin between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion 3 D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer can significantly shorten or decrease the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,bladder neck-urethral anastomosis time and hospital stay.It has low positive rate of margin,and high success rate of erectile function retention.It also helps the recovery of early urinary control function.
作者 何洁 任启文 张红 HE Jie;REN Qi-wen;ZHANG Hong(Department of Urology,Nanchong City Center Hospital,Nanchong 637000,China;Department of Pediatrics,Nanchong City Center Hospital,Nanchong 637000,China)
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2020年第3期195-197,共3页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 3D腹腔镜 前列腺根治性术 围术期 尿控恢复 切缘阳性率 3D laparoscopic Radical prostatectomy Perioperative period Urinary control recovery Positive rate of margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献117

  • 1梁朝朝,周骏.3D腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):161-162. 被引量:25
  • 2马秀芬,韩清玲,李鑫,周立纯,汲烨.经尿道前列腺电切术对老年前列腺增生患者生活质量的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2283-2284. 被引量:61
  • 3巩传凤,刘畅,王岚,于泳江.老年中晚期前列腺癌同期调强放疗联合内分泌治疗的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(10):2744-2745. 被引量:15
  • 4高新,邱剑光,蔡育彬,周祥福,温星桥.控尿技术在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):176-179. 被引量:29
  • 5Garcia-Segui A, Galan-Llopis JA. Three dimensional (3D) uro- logical laparoscopy[ J]. Actas Urol Esp,2013,37(9) :592-593.
  • 6Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen DP, et al. Perioperative, patholog- ic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical pros- tatectomy-a retrospective, single-surgeon study[J]. J Endourol, 2014,28 (5) :539-543.[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2013,11:4.
  • 7Sahu D, Mathew MJ, Reddy PK. 3D Laparoscopy-Help or Hype; Initial Experience of A Tertiary Health Centre [ J ]. J Clin Diagn Res ,2014,8 (7) : NC01-3.
  • 8Alaraimi B, E1 Bakbak W, Sarker S, et al. A randomized pro- spective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three- dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy [ J ]. World J Surg,2014,38( 11 ) :2746-2752.
  • 9Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study[ J]. Surg Endosc,2013,27 ( 1 ) :286-294.
  • 10Yamanaka N, Nagai E, Ohuchida K, et al. Feasibility of laparo- scopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer with positive perito- neal cytology[J]. Surg Today, 2013,43(8) :859-864.

共引文献254

同被引文献118

引证文献9

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部