期刊文献+

右美托咪定预防超声引导臂丛神经阻滞止血带疼痛效果评价 被引量:3

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析右美托咪定预防超声引导臂丛神经阻滞止血带疼痛的效果。方法选取2017年10月-2019年11月在我院进行治疗的60例患者,使用随机分配法分为对比组30例,研究组30例。对比组患者给予罗哌卡因,研究组患者给予右美托咪,比较2组患者不同时点生命体征、VAS评分和Ramsay评分、不良反应发生情况。结果 2组患者止血带充气前与止血带放气10 min后的MAP、HR差异较小(P>0.05);研究组止血带充气30 min、止血带充气60 min后的MAP、HR明显低于对比组(P<0.05)。2组患者止血带充气前的VAS评分和Ramsay评分差异较小(P>0.05);研究组患者在止血带充气30 min、止血带充气60 min、止血带放气10 min后的VAS评分均低于对比组,Ramsay评分高于对比组(P<0.05)。研究组的不良反应发生率(6.67%)明显低于对比组(26.67%)(P<0.05)。结论对进行臂丛神经阻滞的手术患者使用右美托咪定,具有较高的安全性,可降低平均动脉压,对心率影响小,并且能够有效减轻患者的疼痛感,降低不良情况的发生,值得推广使用。
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2020年第13期1823-1825,共3页 The Medical Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献42

  • 1Marhofer D, Kettner SC, Marhofer P, et al. Dexmedetomi- dine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs peripheral nerve block : a volunteer study [ J ]. Br Anaesth, 2013,110 (3) : 438 -442.
  • 2Abdallah FW, Brull R. Facilitatory effects of perineural dexmedetomidine on neuraxial and peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta- analysis [ J ]. Br Anaesth, 2013,110(6) :915 ~ 925.
  • 3Rutkowska K, Knapik P, Misiolek H. The effect of dexme- detomidine sedation on brachial plexus block in patients with end- stage renal disease [ J ]. Eur Anaesthesiol, 2009 , 26 (10) :851~855.
  • 4Swami SS, Keniya VM, Ladi SD, et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine (or2 agonist drugs ) as an adjuvant to local anaesthesia in supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomised double-blind prospective study [ J ].Indian Anaesth, 2012 , 56 ( 3 ) : 243 ~ 249.
  • 5Pere P, Pitkaneu M, Tuominen M, et al. Radiological comparison of perivascular and truananarterial techniques of axillary brachial plexus bloek[J].Br J Anaesth, 1993,70(3) : 276-279.
  • 6Jaakola ML, Salonen M, Lehtinen R, et al. The analgesic action of dexmedetomidine a novel alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist in healthy vol- unteers[J]. Pine, 1991,469(3) ;281-285.
  • 7Arain SR,Ruehlow RM, Uhrieh TD, et al. The efficacy of dexme- detomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery[J]. Anesth Analg,2004,98(2):153-158.
  • 8Dere K,Sucullu I,Budak ET,et al.A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation,pain and hemodynamic control,during colonoscopy under conscious sedation[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2010,27(7):648-652.
  • 9Ivano FH,Romeiro PC,Matias JE,et al.Comparative study of efficacy and safety between propofol and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy[J].Rev Col Bras Cir,2010,37(1):10-16.
  • 10Koroglu A,Teksan H,Sagir O,et al.A comparison of the sedative hemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnelie resonance imaging[J].Anesth Analg,2006,103(1):63-67.

共引文献47

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部