期刊文献+

中美关系力量结构变化导致了中美贸易摩擦? 被引量:7

The Change of Power Structure of Sino-US Relation Leading to the Trade Friction?
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本轮中美贸易摩擦的发生是美国对华政策深度调整的结果,根源于中美关系框架内不同性质的力量发生实质演变。中美货物贸易逆差是全球价值链体系内东亚区域整合的必然结果,因而具有很强的不可逆特征。美国主动挑起贸易摩擦的时机选择体现了其战略考量。作为中美关系中重要的正面力量,经贸关系的“压舱石”作用在不断弱化,政治、安全等负面力量不断发酵并呈现出主导中美关系走向的态势。此次中美史诗级贸易摩擦是美国社会对华负面力量不断叠加并积累到一定程度的结果。“文明的冲突”加剧了中美关系正负力量失衡并使天平逐渐向负面力量倾斜。面对中美贸易摩擦的复杂性和长期性,基于发展视角提出中国理性客观应对中美贸易摩擦的战略与策略。 The outbreak of Sino-US trade friction is the result of the in-depth adjustment of the United States’political attitude to China,originating from the essential changes in the internal power structure of Sino-US relations.The Sino-US merchandise trade deficit is the inevitable result of the integration of regional industrial chains in East Asia under global value chain,hence with its strong irreversibility.The U.S.timing selection of starting the trade friction against China reflects its strategic thinking.As an important positive force,the role of economic and trade relations as“ballast stone”is weakening,while negative forces such as politics and national security are fermenting,and show a trend of dominating Sino-US relations.To some extent,the outbreak of the Sino-US trade friction is the result of the continuous superposition and accumulating of negative forces towards China in the United States.The“conflicts of civilization”aggravates the imbalance of positive and negative forces in the framework of the Sino-US relation and makes the balance gradually incline to negative forces.Faced with the complexity and longevity of the Sino-US trade friction,this paper puts forward some strategies and tactics to deal with Sino-US trade frictions rationally and objectively based on the perspective of development.
作者 朱福林 ZHU Fulin(Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation,Beijing 100710,China)
出处 《浙江工商大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期73-84,共12页 Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国服务贸易发展战略研究”(19FJLA002)。
关键词 中美关系 贸易摩擦 修昔底德陷阱 “三零”规则 Sino-US relations trade friction Thucydides trap the“Three Zero”rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献47

共引文献428

同被引文献150

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部