摘要
监察体制改革催生了监察法与刑事诉讼法的衔接问题。这两部法律的衔接并非仅在技术层面进行简单的对接与协同,而面临着深层次的内在诉讼价值冲突协调。监察法强调刑事司法的“犯罪控制价值”,而刑事诉讼法力求“打击犯罪”与“保障人权”并重。内在价值的冲突让程序机制的衔接变得更为复杂,涉及“侦查”与“调查”的区分与衔接、职务犯罪案件的管辖衔接、强制措施衔接、退回补充调查的程序衔接以及认罪认罚程序的衔接等。从政治效果看,“乱世用重典”的刑罚观可在短期内发挥震慑作用,形成不敢腐的氛围,但长远之计还应构建“打击犯罪”与“保障人权”并举的稳定制度,注重反腐的可持续性及程序正当性。
The reform of the supervision system raises the consensus issue of the Supervision Law and the Criminal Procedure Law.The convergence of the two laws cannot be achieved only by the technical connection and synergy,but also by dissolving the inner conflicts of the litigation values.For one thing,the Supervision Law lays stress on the“Criminal Control Value”of the criminal justice;for another,the Criminal Procedure Law strives to attach equal importance to both“Combating Crime”and“Protecting Human Rights”.Because of the conflicting schemes of values which are possessed by the two laws separately,the convergence of the processes becomes complex,which contains the distinction between criminal“investigation”and supervising“survey”,the jurisdiction of the duty crime cases,the conversion of the coercive measures,the process of returning a case for supplementary survey,and the pleading guilty procedure for a lenient punishment,etc.For the political effect,“adopting severe punishment in trouble times”can play an important role in the short term,which may establish the atmosphere that no one dares to commit corruption crimes.But a system of both“Combating Crimes”and“Protecting Human Rights”is the long-term solution,which lays the emphasis on both the sustainability and the due process of the anti-corruption in China.
作者
施鹏鹏
马志文
SHI Pengpeng;MA Zhiwen(Research Institute of Evidence Science,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期41-51,共11页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“人民陪审员制度的实质化改革研究”(17BFX046)。
关键词
监察法
刑事诉讼法
程序衔接
打击犯罪
保障人权
the Supervision Law
the Criminal Procedure Law
the convergence of the processes
combating crimes
protecting human rights
