摘要
[目的 /意义]拟通过对中国科研人员发表的金色OA论文现状进行分析,一方面可以宏观的了解中国科研人员参与开放获取状况,另一方面通过对比,希望能够借鉴他国的开放获取经验,对推动中国的OA进程及政策制定有一定的参考意义。[方法 /过程]基于Web of Science核心合集数据库收录的论文,分析了中国金色OA论文现状,分析指标包括论文生产力、影响力、基金资助、期刊分布及学科分布。[结果/结论]中国金色OA论文近年来展现出良好的发展势头,但是,金色OA论文率仍低于全球平均水平;中国金色OA论文的引文影响力接近非OA论文,但低于绿色OA论文;论文的金色OA率远远低于基金资助率;中国金色OA论文分布的期刊相对集中,发表在国内OA期刊上的数量较少;生命科学、预临床与健康领域对开放获取参与情况较好。
[Purpose/Significance]This paper aims to analyze the current situation of golden OA papers published by Chinese scholars.On the one hand,it helps us understand the situation of Chinese scholars’participation in open access;on the other hand,through comparison,it provides insights for China to learn from the experience of other countries’open access,which is of value and reference in promoting China’s OA process and policy-making.[Method/Process]Based on the papers included in the Web of Science Core Databases,this paper analyzes the status of golden OA papers in China,and the analysis indicators include paper productivity,influence,funding support,journals distribution and subjects distribution.[Results/Conclusions]China’s golden OA papers have shown a good momentum of development in recent years,but the golden OA paper rate is still lower than the global average level;the citation influence of China’s golden OA papers is close to non-OA papers,but lower than green OA papers;the rate of golden OA papers is far lower than the rate of papers supported by funding;China’s golden OA papers are relatively concentrated into several journals,and the number of OA journals published in China is relatively small;life science,clinical,preclinical and health fields have a higher degree of acceptance of open access papers.
作者
李广利
白雪
张美琦
LI Guangli;BAI Xue;ZHANG Meiqi(Beijing Normal University Library,Beijing 100875)
出处
《农业图书情报学报》
2020年第1期40-46,共7页
Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
