摘要
目的:观察不同蓝光照射方式对新生儿黄疸的治疗效果及不良反应情况。方法:2017年2月-2018年2月收治新生儿黄疸患儿760例,随机分为两组,各380例。对照组采用持续光疗照射疗法;研究组给予间隙光疗照射疗法。比较两组治疗后总胆红素水平及不良反应发生率。结果:研究组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后总胆红素水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:间歇蓝光照射与持续性蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸的效果相当,但间隙蓝光照射治疗后不良反应发生率相对较少。
Objective:To observe the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of different blue light irradiation methods on neonatal jaundice.Methods:760 cases of neonatal jaundice were selected from February 2017 to February 2018,they were randomly divided into the two groups with 380 cases in each group.The control group was treated with continuous phototherapy and the study group was treated with interstitial phototherapy.The level of total bilirubin and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups after treatment.Results:The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the level of total bilirubin between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion:Intermittent blue light irradiation has the same effect as continuous blue light irradiation in the treatment of neonatal jaundice,but the incidence of adverse reactions after interval blue light irradiation is relatively less.
作者
冉琴
颜金城
Ran Qin;Yan Jincheng(Department of Neonatology,the People's Hospital of Kaizhou District,Chongqing 405400)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2020年第9期32-32,34,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
蓝光照射
新生儿黄疸
治疗效果
不良反应
Blue light irradiation
Neonatal jaundice
Therapeutic effect
Adverse reactions
