混合式教学有效性的实证研究——以山东理工大学的68门多学科课程为例被引量：59

An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Blended Teaching--Taking 68 Multidisciplinary Courses of Shandong University of Technology for Example

下载PDF

导出

摘要教学效果是当前国内外混合式教学研究与实践的重要内容,但目前针对混合式教学有效性的专题研究还比较少。基于此,文章立足于大学课堂,构建了混合式教学有效性评价指标体系,并在山东理工大学的68门多学科课程中开展了实证研究,结果发现:混合式教学改变了课堂教学结构,体现了学生在课堂教学中的主体地位;对混合式教学效果影响最大的因素是"教学内容",而非"教学方法";实施混合式教学的课程,期末考试卷面成绩和课程综合成绩的优良率均呈上升趋势,而不及格率呈现明显的下降趋势。文章对混合式教学有效性的实证研究,可为深化混合式教学研究、推动课程教学改革提供参考。 Teaching effect is an important part of the research and practice of blended teaching at home and abroad, but there are few special researches on the effectiveness of blended teaching. Based on this, the paper constructed an evaluation index system for the effectiveness of blended teaching based on university classroom, and further conducted an empirical study in 68 multidisciplinary courses of Shandong University of Technology. It was found that blended teaching changed the structure of classroom teaching and reflected the students’ subject status in classroom teaching. The most influential factor to blended teaching effect was "teaching contents", rather than "teaching methods". After implementing blended teaching courses, the test paper scores of final exams and the excellent rates of courses’ comprehensive performances showed an upward trend, while the failure rates showed an obvious downward trend. The empirical study on the effectiveness of blended teaching in this paper could provide reference for deepening blended teaching research and promoting curriculum reform.

作者管恩京张鹤方冯超刘文秀 GUAN En-jing;ZHANG He-fang;FENG Chao;LIU Wen-xiu(Office of Teaching Affairs,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,Shandong,China 255049;Law School,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,Shandong,China 255049)

机构地区山东理工大学教务处山东理工大学法学院

出处《现代教育技术》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期39-44,共6页 Modern Educational Technology

基金 2018年山东省本科高校教学改革研究(重点)项目“慕课应用模式及学生学习质量评价体系的研究与实践”(项目编号:Z2018Z035)资助。

关键词混合式教学教学有效性教学评价影响因素 blended teaching teaching effectiveness teaching evaluation influencing factors

分类号 G40-057 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1王佳利.基于AHP的网络辅助教学质量评价研究[J].现代教育技术,2013,23(6):102-106. 被引量：16
2路兴,赵国栋,原帅,李志刚.高校教师的“混合式学习”接受度及其影响因素研究——以北大教学网为例[J].远程教育杂志,2011,29(2):62-69. 被引量：52
3高瑞利.混合式学习评价体系的设计与实践[J].中国成人教育,2010(15):129-130. 被引量：19

二级参考文献36

1俎媛媛.美国真实性学生评价及其启示[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(03B):62-66. 被引量：39
2Stephan Vincent-Lancrin (2005). E-learning in Tertiary Education, OECD Observer, December 2005, http://wwwl, need. org/seripts/ publications/bookshop/[ 2010 - 12 - 26 ].
3Young, J. R. 'Hybrid' teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction [ M ]. Chron. High. Edue. , 2002 : A -33.
4Tom Browne, Roger Hewitt, Martin Jenkins and Richard Walker, 2008 survey of technology enhanced learning for higher education in UK [ M ]. Universities and colleges Information systems Association. 2008.
5Charles D. Dziubaa, Joel L. Hartman, Patsy D. Moskal (2004).混合式学习.http ://net. educause, edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407, pdf[2010 -12 -26].
6赵国栋,原帅等.2010年中国高校信息化调查报告[R].北京大学教育学院教育技术系,2010,12.
7北京大学信息化建设与管理办公室.北京大学信息化建设规划及实施方案(2006-2015)[R].北京大学,2005.
8赵国栋,李志刚.利用"北大教学网"促进教学改革:北京大学E/H-learning应用效果调研[R].北京大学现代教育技术中心,2010,12.
9Garrison, D. R. and Vanghan, N. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines [ M ]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2007.
10Humbert, J. and Vignare, K. PiT introduces blended learning successfully[A]. In J. C. Moore Engaging Communities: Wisdom from the Sloan Consortium [ C ]. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. 2004 : 141 - 152.