摘要
从概念上看,认罪认罚从宽具有政策、原则和制度三重维度的含义,三者之间具有一定的内在逻辑关系。制度维度下的认罪认罚从宽是集实体规范与程序规范于一体的综合性法律制度,其核心规则是一种控辩合意程序,目的是以一个相对公开、规范的程序平台落实“职权式从宽”和“法定从宽”,其“协商”意义比较有限,既难以被解释为认罪协商,也不能简单推定为量刑协商。认罪认罚从宽的研究应放在审判中心的视野之下,两者之间的“关系论”既关乎整个刑事诉讼格局的逻辑自洽问题,也关乎一些具体制度规定和实践运作的合理性问题。立足于中国式控辩合意程序的核心定位,对认罪认罚从宽制度进行符合当下制度定位和司法背景的规范化、正当化的调整显得意义更为明显。
Conceptually,the system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment with leniency(PGAPL)has three dimensions of meaning-namely policy,principle and institution,with a certain inherent logic among them.PGAPL in the institutional dimension is a comprehensive legal system consisting of substantive and procedural norms.Its core rule is a prosecution and defense agreement procedure;its purpose is to implement the“inquisitorial-type leniency”and“statutory leniency”through a relatively open and standardized procedure platform;and its meaning of“negotiation”is limited and can neither be interpreted as a plea negotiation,nor simply presumed as sentencing negotiations.The research on PGAPL should be carried out from the perspective of trial-centralism-the relation between the two concerns not only the logical consistency of the pattern of criminal proceedings as a whole,but also the rationality of some specific institutional provisions and practical operations.It is of great significance to standardize and justify the system of PGPAL on the basis the core positioning of Chinese-style prosecution and defense agreement procedure and in line with the current institutional positioning and judicial background.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期23-36,共14页
Global Law Review
