摘要
从媒介架构理论出发考察"网络中立"作为传播渠道管制政策的历史由来,展现美国互联网规制中的利益协商。网络中立政策源于美国针对电话和有线电视分别采行的"公共承运"原则和"必载条款",要求网络运营商为互联网服务商和用户提供无差别的传输服务。本质上是通过限制互联网"物理层"达到保护"应用层"和"内容层"权益的目的,论争分歧在于如何理解"创新"和"自由",更深层原因则是互联网特性与制度文化之间存在张力。"元媒介"技术使互联网产业主体多元化,而基于二元框架的制度文化无法有效协调多重博弈。因此,国家在规范新兴媒介的问题上需抱持更谦抑的态度。
On the basis of Media Architecture Theory,this paper takes the interaction between media evolution and government regulation as the main axis to explore the history of Network Neutrality as well as its argument and explanation. Network Neutrality,as a concept of channel concept,originates from the"Common Carrier"and "Must-carry provisions"adopted by the United States respectively for telephone and cable television. Network neutrality requires ISP to provide non-discriminatory access and transport services for service providers and end user,which,in essence,protects the application layer and content layer by regulating the physical layer. The resulting divergence focuses on the understanding of"innovation"and"freedom". The deep reason of this controversy lies in the contradiction between technology and institutional culture,that is,the highly compatible meta-technology diversifies the interests of Internet Industry while the existing institutional culture,based on a dual framework fails to be effectively coordinated.Therefore,the resulting Internet policy issue of"legitimation"becomes prominent.
出处
《晓庄学院社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期120-126,共7页
Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词
互联网规制
网络中立
媒介架构
公共承运
元媒介
internet regulation
network neutrality
media architecture
common carrier
meta-media
