期刊文献+

体系转换:知识产权法律语篇中的隐喻修辞 被引量:2

Systematic Transformation Metaphor in the Discourse of Intellectual Property Law
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 隐喻修辞架构了知识产权制度的概念体系,它在知识产权法律语篇中具有四种应用场景:法律原则隐喻、法律方法隐喻、法律文本的风格隐喻和法律语言的内在隐喻。隐喻的连贯性和一致性也体现在知识产权法律语篇中。"劳作"(积极隐喻)和"窃取"(消极隐喻)属于知识产权法律语篇的核心隐喻;积极隐喻与消极隐喻往往结合一起使用,成为知识产权法律语篇写作与辩论中的主要工具。知识产权法律语篇中的"隐喻族"包括劳动隐喻、航海隐喻,以及附随的刑事盗窃隐喻和疾病隐喻;在新技术时代,航海隐喻族超越农业隐喻族,如海盗、生物海盗、避风港、红旗测试等,它们逐渐进入到常规语言体系而成为"死喻"。 Metaphors in the Discourse of Intellectual Property Law(hereinafter as DIPL)build the conceptual system of intellectual property law and they fall into four categories:Doctrinal Metaphors,Method Metaphors,Stylistic Metaphors and Inherent Metaphors.The coherence and consistency of metaphors are also embodied in DIPL.The positive metaphor‘labor’and negative metaphor‘theft’are the core metaphors and are used together in writing or arguing in DIPL.Metaphor clusters in DIPL include the labor metaphor,the seafaring metaphor,and their accompanying metaphors such as crimes and diseases.The seafaring metaphors,rather than the agricultural metaphor,have become the main metaphors in DIPL in the new technology times.These metaphors,such as pirate,bio-pirate,safe harbor and red flag test,has gradually been part of the conventional legal language in DIPL and become the Dead Metaphors.
作者 肖菲菲 梁志文 XIAO Feifei;LIANG Zhiwen
出处 《晓庄学院社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期70-77,共8页 Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“药品可及性视阈下TRIRs-Plus规则研究”(19FFXB024)
关键词 知识产权 法律语篇 隐喻修辞 农业隐喻 航海隐喻 intellectual property legal discourse metaphor agricultural metaphor seafaring metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1郭贵春,贺天平.科学隐喻:“超逻辑形式”的科学凝集——论科学隐喻的基本原则和表现形态[J].哲学研究,2005(7):93-100. 被引量:11
  • 2Amy Kapczynski, The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property,117 YALE L. J. 807,821 (2008).
  • 3Kathy Bowrey & Natalie Fowell, Digging up Fragments and Building IP Franchises, 31 SYDNEY L. REV. 185,185 (2009).
  • 4A letter from Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson. August 13, 1813, available at http://www.red-bean.com/ kfogel/jefferson-maepherson-letter.html, last visited at Dee. 20, 2009.
  • 5Adam Mossoff, Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson thought about Patent? Reevaluating the Patent "Privilege" in Historical Context, 92 CORNELL L. REV. 953, (2007).
  • 6Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 9 (1966) note2.
  • 7Lawrence Lessig, THE FUTURE OF IDEAS, 58-59 (2001).
  • 8James Boyle, THE PUBLIC DOMAIN: ENCLOSING THE COMMONS OF THE MINDS, 22 (2008).
  • 9英国《整合知识产权与发展政策》报告,导言第7段.
  • 10James Boyle, supra note 8, 49.

共引文献12

同被引文献50

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部