期刊文献+

微创根治性前列腺切除术后非计划再次手术的原因分析及应对策略 被引量:8

Factors influencing unplanned re-operation of prostatic cancer and its countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析微创根治性前列腺切除术(MIRP)后行非计划再次手术的原因,并探讨应对策略。方法回顾性分析浙江省人民医院2014年9月至2019年7月收治的4例行MIRP后非计划再次手术患者的临床资料。年龄56~71岁,平均65岁。术前tPSA 5.17~13.20 ng/ml,平均10.12 ng/ml。均行前列腺穿刺活检诊断为前列腺腺癌,Gleason评分3+3分1例,3+4分2例,4+4分1例。病理分期pT2a期2例,pT2b期2例。首次手术方式为腹腔镜手术1例,机器人手术3例;经腹膜外入路1例,经腹腔入路3例。结果再次手术的原因均为出血:动脉性出血3例(分别为精囊动脉、脐动脉、肠系膜动脉),表现为血流动力学不稳定;静脉性出血1例(耻骨后背深静脉复合体),表现为盆腔血肿、吸收热。4例非计划再次手术均由泌尿外科医生在腹腔镜下(经腹腔入路)完成。处理方式:缝扎出血动脉1例,夹闭出血动脉2例,清除盆腔血肿1例。所有病例经再次手术均治愈出院,随访11~48个月,未见生化复发、真性尿失禁等。结论术后出血是导致MIRP后非计划再次手术的主要原因,选择经腹腔入路腹腔镜探查可迅速找到出血原因,止血效果确切并能去除积血,并发症少,安全、有效。 Objective To analyze the main causes for unplanned re-operation of prostatic cancer.Methods The clinical data of 4 patients with prostatic cancer who underwent an unplanned re-operation were analyzed retrospectively between September 2014 and July 2019 in our hospital.Preoperative data of patients was collected as follows:mean age of 65 years,ranged from 56 to 71 years.tPSA ranged from 5.17-13.20 ng/ml.Gleason score of 3+3 in 1 case,3+4 in 2 cases,4+4 in 1 case.pTNM pT2a in 2 Cases,pT2b in 2 cases.LRP(extraperitoneal approach)in 1 case,RARP(transperitoneal approach)in 3 cases.Results The main causes for unplanned re-operation were as follows:perioperative hemodynamic instability(75%,3/4),post-operative fever(25%,1/4).All 4 re-operations were performed by urologists using Laparoscopic exploration of abdomen.Conclusions Inadequate and inappropriate surgical hemostasis are the key to lead a second-look surgery of prostatic cancer.A complete hemostasis could help to lower the re-operation rate.Laparoscopic exploration of abdomen could be one of the choices to deal with re-operation after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
作者 沃奇军 祁小龙 刘锋 张琦 毛祖杰 张大宏 Wo Qijun;Qi Xiaolong;Liu Feng;Zhang Qi;Mao Zujie;Zhang Dahong(Department of Urology,Zhejiang Provincial People*5 Hospital,Hangzhou People*s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou 3]0014,China)
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第12期905-908,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 前列腺切除术 微创 非计划再手术 并发症 Prostatic neoplasms Prostatectomy Minimally invasive Unplanned re-operation Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1丁强,李宏召,张旭,王保军,马鑫,瓦斯里江.瓦哈甫,杨国强,郑涛.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术疗效分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):166-168. 被引量:6
  • 2叶定伟.前列腺癌的流行病学和中国的发病趋势[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(6):362-364. 被引量:170
  • 3Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, et al. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after ro- botic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2010, 57: 363-370.
  • 4Hisasue S, Takahashi A, Kato R, et al. Early and late complica- tions of radical retropubie prostatectomy: Experience in a single institution. Jpn J Clin Oneol, 2004, 34: 274-279.
  • 5Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Din- do classification of surgical complications five-year experience.Ann Surg, 2009, 250: 187-196.
  • 6Trinh QD, Sehmitges J, Sun M, et al. Open radical prostateeto- my in the elderly: a case for concern?. BJU Int, 2012, 109: 1335-1340.
  • 7Loeb S, Roehl KA, Helfand BT, et al. Complications of open radical retropubic prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring. Urology, 2008, 72: 887-891.
  • 8Chalasani V, Martinez CH, Lim D, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for ro- bot-assisted radical prostateetomy. Can Urol Assoe J, 2010, 4: 250-254.
  • 9Stranne J, Lodding P. Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Urol, 2011, 8 : 267-273.
  • 10Chalasani V, Martinez CH, Lim D, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for ro- bot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J, 2010, 4: 250-254.

共引文献546

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部