期刊文献+

CT管腔内对比度衰减梯度及改良校正的管腔内对比度衰减梯度对冠状动脉功能性狭窄的诊断初探 被引量:5

The preliminary assessment of transluminal attenuation gradient and modified transluminal attenuation gradient-corrected coronary opacification for coronary arterial functional stenosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨并比较CT管腔内对比度衰减梯度(TAG)和改良校正的管腔内对比度衰减梯度(MTAG-CCO)对冠状动脉功能性狭窄的诊断价值。方法收集2016年2月~2017年8月来我院就诊并有意愿行CCTA及FFR检查的冠心病患者。将所有冠状动脉分为无功能性狭窄组(FFR>0.80)和功能性狭窄组(FFR≤0.80);记录每支冠状动脉的TAG、MTAG-CCO及FFR值,比较两组间TAG、MTAG-CCO,并计算TAG、TAG-CCO、CCTA及TAG+CCTA及MTAG-CCO+CCTA对功能性狭窄的灵敏度、特异度,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果纳入35例患者(37支冠状动脉)。无功能性狭窄组和功能性狭窄组(-15.39±2.250 vs-19.87±2.054)HU/10mm的TAG之间不存在显著性差异(P=0.1561),MTAG-CCO(-0.02521±0.001867 vs-0.03260±0.002369)/10mm之间存在显著性差异(P=0.0179)。单独CCTA的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为50.0%,17.6%,41.7%和23.1%;TAG分别为55.0%,11.8%,42.3%和18.2%;MTAG-CCO分别为15.0%,41.2%,23.1%和29.2%;TAG+CCTA分别为90.0%,5.9%,52.9%和33.3%;MTAG-CCO+CCTA分别为50.0%,52.9%,55.6%和47.4%。结论MTAG-CCO较TAG有进一步区别冠状动脉功能性狭窄的可能性;MTAG-CCO+CCTA的敏感度、特异度均较高。 Objective The aim of this study was compared the transluminal attenuation gradient(TAG)and modified transluminal attenuation gradient-corrected coronary opacification(MTAG-CCO)in assessing coronary artery functional stenosis.Methods This prospective study recuited coronary artery stenosis patients who intented to do CCTA and FFR examination.All the vessels were divided into 2 groups:non-functional stenosis group(FFR>0.80)and functional stenosis group(FFR≤0.80).The TAG,MTAG-CCO and FFR values were recorded.All the TAG,MTAG-CCO were compared respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of TAG,MTAG-CCO,CCTA and MTAG-CCO+CCTA,and TAG+CCTA were evaluated.Results 35 patients(37 coronary arteries)were recuited.The TAG of non-functional stenosis group and functional stenosis group was(-15.39±2.250,-19.87±2.054)HU/10mm(P=0.1561),MTAG-CCO of the 2 group was(-0.02521±0.001867,-0.03260±0.002369)/mm(P=0.0179).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CCTA were 50.0%,17.6%,41.7%and 23.1%;TAG was 55.0%,11.8%,42.3%and 18.2%;MTAG-CCO were 15.0%,41.2%,23.1%and 29.2%;TAG+CCTA were 90.0%,5.9%,52.9%and 33.3%;MTAG-CCO+CCTA were 50.0%,52.9%,55.6%and 47.4%.Conclusion MTAG-CCO had the potential to further differentiate coronary artery functional stenosis compared with TAG;MTAG-CCO+CCTA had higher sensitivity and specificity.
作者 阚晓婧 葛英辉 刘霄静 张继良 谢瑞刚 潘玉坤 KAN Xiaojing;GE Yinghui;LIU Xiaojing;ZHANG Jiliang;XIE Ruigang;Pan Yukun(Department of Radiology,Henan Provincial People’s Hospital,Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,P.R.China)
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2019年第12期2034-2037,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 河南省医学科技攻关项目(编号:201702160) 河南省科技厅立项项目(编号:172102310520)
关键词 冠心病 体层摄影术 X线计算机 冠状动脉成像 密度梯度 Coronary heart disease Tomography X-ray computed Coronary imaging Transluminal attenuation gradient
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1韩雅玲.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(12):50-59. 被引量:134
  • 2R.Goetti,G.Feuchtner,P.Stolzmann,L.Desbiolles,M.A.Fischer,C.Karlo,李瑞丽.双源CT大螺距冠状动脉成像:心率过快时心脏收缩期的数据采集[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2011(1):89-90. 被引量:11
  • 3王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,张竹花,宋兰,张抒扬,张立仁,林松柏,王沄,赵文敏.64层与16层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像比较[J].中国医学科学院学报,2006,28(1):26-31. 被引量:44
  • 4王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,宋兰,张竹花,张抒扬,林松柏,牟文斌,王沄,赵文敏,郭家武.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):797-801. 被引量:99
  • 5无.慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(3):195-206. 被引量:2193
  • 6Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease : a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons [ J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2012, 60(24) : e44 -e164.
  • 7Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology [J]. Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(38) : 2949 -3D03.
  • 8Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease : A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascu- lar Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons [ J/OL]. J Am Coll Cardiol, (2014-07-18) [2014-10-15 ] doi : 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2014.07. 017.
  • 9Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H, et al. A clinical prediction role for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. [J]. Eur Heart J, 2011,32(11 ) : 1316 - 1330.
  • 10Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB, et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease [ J]. Ann Intem Med, 1993, 118(2) : 81 -90.

共引文献132

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部