摘要
关于今本《孔子家语》的真伪问题,在历史上主要有三种意见,王肃伪书说居于主导地位。随着出土文献的不断发现,王肃伪书说产生了动摇。宁镇疆先生根据出土的《儒家者言》提出了今本《孔子家语》"层累"成书说,并声明"层累"成书并非伪书,只是后人大规模整理的产物。从文献记载的宓子贱、冉耕及漆雕启三位孔门弟子的言行来看,《孔子家语》"层累"成书说具有合理性。
There are three main opinions about the authenticity of the present edition of Records of Confucius’ Philosophy in history, Wang Su’s theory of pseudograph is in the leading position. With the continuous discovery of unearthed documents, Wang Su’s theory of fake books has been shaken. Mr. Ning Zhenjiang put forward the theory of "Accretion Theory"into the book of Confucius family language according to the unearthed "words of Confucians",and declared that "Accretion Theory" into the book is not a fake book, but a product of large-scale arrangement of later generations. From the words and deeds of three Confucius’ disciples recorded in the literature, i.e. Mi Zijian,Ran Geng and Qi Diaoqi, It can be seen that the theory of "Accretion Theory" in Records of Confucius’ Philosophy is reasonable.
作者
董龙光
Dong Longguang(College of Liberal Arts,Heilongjiang University,Harbin Heilongjiang 150074,Chirm)
出处
《天水师范学院学报》
2019年第5期45-49,共5页
Journal of Tianshui Normal University
基金
黑龙江大学研究生创新科研项目资金资助“《汉志》儒家类亡佚子书五种考论”（YJSCX2019-116HLJU）阶段性成果
关键词
《孔子家语》
层累
成书
Records of Confucius’ Philosophy
Accretion Theory
complete the book
