摘要
合法性危机催生国际投资仲裁的改革。关于国际投资仲裁的改革方向正处在众说纷纭、观点对立、走向不明的状态,其中核心在于投资仲裁的"商事化"与"去商事化"之争。从应然层面看,国际投资仲裁的"商事化"是有争议的,商事仲裁理论在解决涉及一方为主权国家的投资争议时可能存在正当性与合法性问题。从实然层面看,借用且套用商事仲裁的ICSID投资仲裁机制大体上运行良好并且越来越多的商事仲裁机制采用商事仲裁规则管辖投资争议已然成为一种趋向。无论是理论上还是实践中,投资仲裁的"商事化"均具有可取性,商事仲裁机制管辖投资争议应当被允许以及鼓励。"一带一路"趋势下,我国应当以业已出台投资者-东道国仲裁规则的商事仲裁机构为依托并打造具有影响力和国际竞争力的中国投资仲裁机制。
The crisis of legitimacy is spurring reform of international investment arbitration. The reform direction of international investment arbitration is in a state of different opinions, opposite opinions and unknown direction. Its core lies in the dispute between "commercialization" and "de-commercialization" of investment arbitration. From the perspective of inevitability, the "commercialization" of international investment arbitration is controversial. The theory of commercial arbitration may have legitimacy and legality problems when solving the investment disputes concerning a sovereign state. From the perspective of reality, the ICSID investment arbitration mechanism which is borrowed and used to commercial arbitration runs well in general, and it has become a trend that more and more commercial arbitration mechanisms adopt commercial arbitration rules to govern investment disputes. Both theoretically and practically, the "commercialization" of investment arbitration is desirable, and the commercial arbitration mechanism should be allowed and encouraged to govern investment disputes. Under the trend of "One Belt and One Road", China should establish an influential and internationally competitive Chinese investment arbitration mechanism based on the commercial arbitration institutions that have issued the investor-host country arbitration rules.
作者
刘晓红
朱怡
LIU Xiao-hong;ZHU Yi(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201700,China)
出处
《上海对外经贸大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期71-84,共14页
Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
关键词
ICSID
投资仲裁
商事化
一带一路
ICSID
investment arbitration
commercialization
One Belt and One Road
