期刊文献+

SO_2排放造成的森林损失计算:以湖南省为例 被引量:3

Valuation of Forest Damage Cost from SO_2 Emission:A Case Study in Hunan Province
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 SO2 排放对我国的森林生态系统造成了严重的损害 ,因而损失计算对于SO2 控制具有重要意义 ,但是目前仍缺乏有效的方法计算不同排放水平下的森林损失 .本研究以硫沉降超临界负荷作为计算森林损失的参数 ,推导了适用于我国硫沉降导致森林损失的剂量 响应函数 ,并以湖南省为例 ,以 1 995为基准年 ,计算了 2 0 0 0年~ 2 0 2 0年高中低 3种SO2 排放方案下的森林损失 .研究结果表明 ,随着今后湖南省经济和能源消费的增长 ,森林损失将继续增加 .高排放方案下 2 0 2 0年SO2 排放将增长 1 2倍 ,但森林损失增长 4 3倍 ,边际损失高于 60 0 0元 /t .在当前排放水平下对SO2 排放进行削减 ,边际效益达到 1 5 0 0元 /t,因此控制SO2 具有显著的经济效益 .对湖南案例的不确定性分析显示 ,计算方法有较高的可靠性 .研究结果为区域SO2 控制策略的优化提供了支持 . Large amount SO 2 emission caused serious damage of forest ecosystem in China and calculation of the damage cost is an important issue for policy making. However, no applicable method was developed to estimate forest damage under different SO 2 emission scenarios. Basing on previous field researches on sulfur related forest impact in China and recent critical load mapping research, this paper presented a model for forest damage calculation by developing a dose response function that related the damage to cumulative sulfur critical loads. This model was applied to the forests in Hunan, a province in acid rain control zone in China. Results showed that in the business as usual case, SO 2 emission in Hunan will increase by 120% from 1995 (8 82 mil. ton) to 2020 (19 56 mil. ton), but damage cost will increase by 4 3 times, reaching 6 19 billion RMB in 2020 Results also showed the measures for SO 2 control were cost effective because the marginal damage cost will be about 6000 RMB per ton SO 2 in 2020 in BAU case. At current SO 2 emission level, marginal benefit will be about 1500 RMB per ton. Uncertainty analysis demonstrated that this model provides reasonable damage estimates and would therefore be applicable in a broad range of policy settings.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第6期1-5,共5页 Environmental Science
基金 世界银行资助项目 (P0 6 2 0 15 )
关键词 SO2 计算 湖南 森林 临界负荷 经济损失 气体排放 forest damage cost dose response function critical load Hunan Province
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

共引文献127

同被引文献40

  • 1颜夕生.江苏省农业环境污染造成的经济损失估算[J].农业环境保护,1993,12(4):158-160. 被引量:22
  • 2欧寿铭,潘荔卿,庄马展.厦门地区酸沉降造成的影响及经济损失估算[J].环境科学研究,1996,9(5):57-59. 被引量:3
  • 3李伟,劳川奇.绿色GDP核算的国际实践与启示[J].生态经济,2006,22(9):69-72. 被引量:13
  • 4Krutilla, John V. Some Environmental Effects of Economic Development[J]. Daedalus, 1967,96(4).
  • 5Dean, J.M. Does Trade Liberalization Harm the Environment? A New Test [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2002, 35(4).
  • 6Dubourg, W.R. Estimating the Mortality Costs of Lead Emission in England and Wales[J]. Energy Policy, 1990, 24(7).
  • 7Euston Quah, and Tay Liam Boon. The Economic Cost of Particulate Air Pollution on Health in Singapore[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2003, 14(1).
  • 8Cowell, D.,and Apsimon H. Estimating the Cost of Damage to Buildings by Acidifying Atmospheric Pollution in Europe[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30(17).
  • 9Delucchi, M. A., Murphy J.J., and McCubbin D.R. The Health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: A Comparison of Estimation Methods[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 64(2).
  • 10Seung-Jun Kwak, Seung-Hoon Yoo, and Tai-Yoo Kim. A Constructive Approach to Air-quality Valuation in Korea[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, (38).

引证文献3

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部