期刊文献+

Agent逻辑和真假子集语义 被引量:2

Agent Logic and the True-False Subset Semantics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 理性Agent规约的形式框架通常基于信念、愿望和意图逻辑.为了克服现有的信念、愿望和意图逻辑中存在的问题,为非正规模态算子提供一种合适的语义表示.讨论了理性Agent性态的抽象规约中对语义表示的要求以及现有的信念、愿望和意图逻辑中存在的问题.介绍了作者开发的真假子集语义及其在Agent形式化中的应用.他们的框架使意图的有问题的性质无效.并且证明通过对模型的代数结构施加一定的约束,能获得许多希望的性质.最后对真假子集语义进行了分析.这一切表明真假子集语义为非正规模态算子提供了一种合适的语义表示,是对经典的正规模态算子可能世界语义的一个重要发展,是理性Agent性态的逻辑规约的有力工具,可应用于建立新的合适的Agent逻辑系统. Formal frameworks for the specification of rational agents are commonly based on logic of belief, desire and intention. In order to eliminate the problems with existing logic of belief, desire and intention, and to provide a proper semantic representation for non-normal modal operator, the problems with existing logic of belief, desire and intention are addressed, the true-false subset semantics, which is developed by the authors, and its application in the formalization of agent are introduced. The proposed framework invalidates the problematic properties of intention, and by imposing certain constraints on the algebraic structure of the models, it is showed that many desirable properties can be obtained. Finally the true-false subset semantics is analyzed. Thus the true-false subset semantics provides a proper semantic representation for non-normal modal operator. It is an important development of classical possible worlds semantics for normal modal operators, and is proved to be a powerful tool for the logical specification of rational agent behavior. It can be applied to establish a new proper agent logic system.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2002年第11期2112-2115,共4页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(69973023) 福建省自然科学基金资助项目(F00012 F00013)~~
关键词 AGENT 逻辑 真假子集语义 人工智能 Algebra Constraint theory Formal logic Mathematical models Mathematical operators Modal analysis Multi agent systems Semantics Specifications
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bratman, M.E. Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • 2Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J. Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 1990,42(2-3):213~261.
  • 3Konolige, K., Pollack, M.E. A representationalist theory of intention. In: Bajcsy, R., ed. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1993. 390~395.
  • 4Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P. Modeling rational Agents within a BDI architecture. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E., eds. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference (KR'91). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1991. 473~484.
  • 5Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P. The semantics of intention maintenance for rational Agents. In: Mellish, S.C., ed. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1995. 704~710.
  • 6Cavedon, L., Padgham, L., Rao, A., et al. Revisiting rationality for Agents with intentions. In: Xin, Yao, ed. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 1995.131~138.
  • 7胡山立,石纯一.适用于Agent非正规模态算子的一种语义解释[J].计算机研究与发展,1999,36(10):1153-1157. 被引量:8
  • 8胡山立,fzu.edu.cn,石纯一.Agent的意图模型[J].软件学报,2000,11(7):965-970. 被引量:24
  • 9胡山立,石纯一.Agent-BDI逻辑[J].软件学报,2000,11(10):1353-1360. 被引量:21

二级参考文献6

  • 1周北海,模态逻辑导论,1997年
  • 2Rao A S,Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligenc,1991年,498页
  • 3Rao A S,Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Proceedings of the 2 nd In,1991年,473页
  • 4Rao A S,Proceedings of the12 th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligenc,1991年,498页
  • 5胡山立,石纯一.适用于Agent非正规模态算子的一种语义解释[J].计算机研究与发展,1999,36(10):1153-1157. 被引量:8
  • 6胡山立,fzu.edu.cn,石纯一.Agent的意图模型[J].软件学报,2000,11(7):965-970. 被引量:24

共引文献44

同被引文献11

  • 1胡山立,石纯一.Agent意图的双子集语义改进模型[J].软件学报,2006,17(3):396-402. 被引量:8
  • 2BRATMAN M E. Intentions ,plans and practical reason[M]. Cambridge :Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • 3COHEN P R ,LEVESQUE H J. Intention is choice with eommitment[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1990,42 (2/3) : 213.
  • 4KONOLIGE K,POLLACK M E. A representationalist theory of intention[C]//BAJCSY R. Proe of the 13th Int'l Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo :Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993 : 390-395.
  • 5RAO A S,GEORGEFF M P. Modeling rational agents within a BDI architeeture[C]//ALLEN J,FIKES R,SANDE- WALL E. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning..Proc of the 2nd Int'l Conf (KR-91). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1991 : 473-484.
  • 6RAO A S,GEORGEFF M P. The semantics of intention maintenance for rational agents[C]//MELLISH S C. Proe of the 14th Int'l Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo :Morgan Kaufmann Publishers ,1995:704-710.
  • 7ALUR R,HENZINGER T A, KUPFERMAN O. Alternating-time temporal logic [J]. Journal of the ACM, 2002,49 (5):672-713.
  • 8LAI Xian-wei,HU Shan-li,NING Zheng-yuan. An improved formal framework of actions,individual intention and group intention for multi-agent systems[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. Hongkong : Springer Press, 2006 : 420-423.
  • 9林运国,陈晓云,胡山立,陈莉.多Agent模糊概率信念逻辑[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,26(1):150-153. 被引量:3
  • 10朱紫汝,陈小平,周熠.一个新的意图后承形式系统L_(m5c)[J].软件学报,2002,13(7):1271-1277. 被引量:3

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部