摘要
关于专断性医疗行为的刑法规制,学界存在研究对象不明、处罚范围不清等问题。医护人员擅自实施的不具有医疗目的性的侵袭行为、紧急医疗行为、强制医疗行为,均应排除在专断性医疗行为的范畴之外。关于专断性医疗行为的刑事处罚范围,“义务说”得出的结论有悖于医疗伦理;“结果说”和“行为说”从不同解释路径出发,得出的结论差别不大。相较而言,“结果说”不利于医疗风险责任分配,“行为说”更具有理论价值和实践指导意义。
As for the criminal law regulation of arbitrary medical treatment,there are some problems in academic circles,such as unclear object of study,and unclear scope of punishment.Unauthorized invasive,emergency and compulsory medical actions carried out by medical personnel should be excluded from the category of arbitrary medical actions.As for the scope of criminal punishment for arbitrary medical treatments,the conclusion drawn by "obligation theory" is contrary to medical ethics,while the conclusion drawn by "results theory" and "behavior theory" from different interpretation paths is of little difference.Comparatively speaking,"result theory" is not conducive to the allocation of medical risk responsibility,and "behavior theory" has more theoretical value and practical guiding significance.
出处
《中州学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第10期67-70,共4页
Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国刑法立法现代化的理论基础与路径选择研究”(18AFX013)
关键词
专断性医疗行为
义务说
结果说
行为说
arbitrary medical treatment
obligation theory
result theory
behaviour theory
