期刊文献+

靶点脉冲射频结合针灸治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析 被引量:1

Clinical Analysis of Target Pulse Radiofrequency Combined with Acupuncture in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨对腰椎间盘突出症患者选择靶点脉冲射频+针灸方法治疗后获得的临床效果。方法选择该院2017年1月—2019年2月收治的103例腰椎间盘突出症患者作为实验对象;数字奇偶法分组后探究每组治疗方法;比照组(51例):选择靶点脉冲射频方法展开治疗;实验组(52例):选择靶点脉冲射频+针灸方法展开治疗;比较两组患者治疗总优良率、镇痛维持时间、镇痛起效时间、疼痛评分以及炎症因子指标。结果实验组腰椎间盘突出症患者治疗总优良率(96.15%)高于比照组(82.35%)明显(χ^2=5.141 0,P<0.05);实验组镇痛维持时间为(29.53±3.29)d,镇痛起效时间为(0.81±0.09)h,治疗前疼痛评分为(5.06±1.21)分,治疗后为(1.25±0.12)分,比照组镇痛维持时间为(17.55±3.33)d,镇痛起效时间为(1.39±0.06)h,治疗前疼痛评分为(5.11±1.25)分,治疗后为(2.59±0.35)分,实验组腰椎间盘突出症患者镇痛维持时间长于比照组明显,镇痛起效时间短于比照组明显(t=18.366 0、38.405 4,P<0.05);治疗前,实验组腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛评分同比照组差异无统计学意义(t=0.206 2,P>0.05);治疗后,实验组腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛评分低于比照组明显(t=26.090 9,P<0.05);实验组肿瘤坏死因子α水平为(1.13±0.24)μg/mL,白细胞介素1β水平为(0.22±0.07)μg/mL,比照组肿瘤坏死因子α水平为(1.52±0.21)μg/mL,白细胞介素1β水平为(0.39±0.06)μg/mL,实验组腰椎间盘突出症患者肿瘤坏死因子α水平以及白细胞介素1β水平均低于比照组明显(t=8.770 0、13.221 9,P<0.05)。结论腰椎间盘突出症患者于临床接受靶点脉冲射频+针灸治疗后,对于治疗总优良率的提升,镇痛维持时间延长,镇痛起效时间缩短,疼痛症状的改善,肿瘤坏死因子α水平以及白细胞介素1β水平的降低,效果明显。 Objective To investigate the clinical effects of selective target pulsed radiofrequency acupuncture in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods 103 patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to February 2019 were selected as subjects. The digital parity method was used to investigate each group of treatment methods. The comparison group (51 cases): selected target pulse radio frequency methods. The experimental group (52 cases): the target pulse pulse radiofrequency + acupuncture method was selected for treatment. The total excellent and good rate, analgesic maintenance time, analgesic onset time, pain score and inflammatory factor index were compared between the two groups. Results The total excellent and good rate of treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation in the experimental group (96.15%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (82.35%)(χ^2=5.141 0,P<0.05). The analgesic maintenance time in the experimental group was (29.53±3.29)d. The analgesic onset time was (0.81±0.09) h, the pre-treatment pain score was (5.06±1.21) points, and the treatment was (1.25±0.12) points. The analgesic maintenance time of the comparison group was (17.55±3.33)d. The onset time was (1.39±0.06) h, the pain score before treatment was (5.11±1.25)points, and the score after treatment was(2.59±0.35)points. The analgesic maintenance time of patients with lumbar disc herniation in the experimental group was longer than that of the control group. The analgesic onset time was shorter than that in the control group(t=18.366 0, 38.405 4,P<0.05). Before treatment, the pain scores of the lumbar disc herniation in the experimental group were not statistically significantly different(t=0.206 2,P>0.05). After treatment, the pain scores of patients with lumbar disc herniation in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(t=26.090 9,P<0.05);the level of tumor necrosis factor α in the experimental group was (1.13±0.24)μg/mL, and the level of interleukin-1β was (0.22±0.07)μg/mL, the tumor necrosis factor α level in the comparison group was (1. 52±0.21)μg/mL, interleukin-1β level was (0.39±0.06)μg/mL. The level of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β in patients with lumbar disc herniation in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(t=8.770 0, 13.221 9,P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with lumbar disc herniation have improved the overall excellent rate of treatment, prolonged analgesic duration, shortened analgesic onset time, improved pain symptoms, and tumor necrosis factor alpha levels after receiving clinical target pulse RF + acupuncture treatment and the reduction of interleukin-1β level, the effect is obvious.
作者 杨丽艳 YANG Li-yan(Linxiang District Chinese Medicine Hospital,Lincang,Yunnan Province,677000 China)
出处 《世界复合医学》 2019年第8期155-157,171,共4页 World Journal of Complex Medicine
关键词 靶点脉冲射频 针灸 腰椎间盘突出症 临床效果 Target pulse radiofrequency Acupuncture Lumbar disc herniation Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献49

  • 1潘磊,尹庆水.两种手术方式治疗腰椎间盘突出的疗效及组织炎症因子水平的变化[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(2):365-367. 被引量:20
  • 2肖礼祖,熊东林,蒋劲,张强,郑虎山,辜树蓉.脉冲射频治疗腰骶部神经根性疼痛的疗效观察[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2004,9(11):489-490. 被引量:9
  • 3Mac Nab I.Negative disc exploration:an analysis of the cause of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1971,53:891-903.
  • 4Chao SC,Lee HT,Kao TH,et al.Percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of cervical and lumbar radicular pain.Surg Neurol,2008,70:59-65.
  • 5Erdine S,Ozyalcin NS,Cimen A,et al.Comparison of pulsed radiofrequency with conventional radiofrequency in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.Eur J pain,2007,11:309-313.
  • 6Koyyalagunta D,Mazloomdoost D,Radiofrequency and cryoablation for cancer pain.Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag,2010,14:3-9.
  • 7Teixeira A,Sluijter ME.Intradiscal high-voltage,longduration pulsed radiofrequency for discogenic pain:a preliminary report.Pain Med,2006,7:424-428.
  • 8Kane T,Rogers P,Hazelgrove J,et al.Pulsed radiofrequency applied to the suprascapular nerve in painful cuff tear arthropathy.J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2008,17:436-440.
  • 9Lindner R,Sluijter ME,Schleinzer W.Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the lumbar medial branch for facet pain:a retrospective analysis.Pain Med,2006,7:435-439.
  • 10陈遇源,曾宾.脉冲射频治疗慢性疼痛的现状及进展[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2008,4(2):133-137. 被引量:14

共引文献71

同被引文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部