期刊文献+

发泡胶与乳腺托架在乳腺癌保乳术后IMRT中固定精度比较 被引量:22

Comparison of imbolization accuracy between styrofoam and breast carrier in intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conservative surgery for breast cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨发泡胶与乳腺托架在乳腺癌保乳术后IMRT体位固定中的精度差异。方法选取2018年2—8月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院收治保乳术后全乳大分割IMRT (42.56 Gy分16次)的乳腺癌患者24例,随机分为发泡胶组和乳腺托架组。使用CBCT于患者第1、3、5、7、9、11次治疗前拍摄正侧位KV图像在线匹配获得两组患者在左右、头脚、腹背的摆位误差,记录两组摆位时间。采用独立样本t检验分析两组间摆位误差,并计算PTV分次间摆位误差的外扩值。结果发泡胶组和乳腺托架组在左右、头脚、腹背方向的摆位误差分别为(2.36±1.89) mm与(2.56±2.05) mm (P=0.49)、(1.76±1.78) mm与(3.28±2.79) mm (P<0.05)、(1.47±1.49) mm与(1.73±1.81) mm (P=0.28);CTV向PTV分次摆位误差的外扩值分别为2.97、2.92、2.21 mm与3.41、4.09、2.59 mm;单次摆位时间分别为(3.4±1.1) min与(5.5±3.1) min (P=0.01)。结论相较乳腺托架,发泡胶的摆位精度明显提升且效率更高。 Objective To investigate the difference of styrofoam and breast carrier in postposition fixation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conservative surgery for breast cancer patients.Methods From February 2018 to August 2018,tweenty-four patients with breast cancer in Sun Yet-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yet-sen University were selected for this study,who underwent hypofactionationed radiotherapy after breast conservative surgery with total dose 42.56 Gy/16Fractions.They were randomized into styrofoam test group and breastcarrier control group.Cone beam CT as used to record the positioning error under the directions of left and right (x),head and foot (y),abdomen and back (y) within two groups at the first,third,fifth,seventh,eleventh time before irradiation.Furthermore,the PTV extension margin was calculated and the positioning time of two groups was recorded.Two sets of pendulum errors were analyzed by independent sample T-test,and the outspread value of inter-fractional set up error of the PTV was calculated.Results The errors of the test group and the control group in the direction of x,y,z were as follows:(2.36±1.89) and (2.56±2.05) mm (P=0.49),(1.76± 1.78) and (3.28±2.79) mm (P<0.05),(1.47± 1.49) and (1.73± 1.81) mm (P=0.28).The extension values of inter-fractional set up error of CTV to PTV were 2.97,2.92,2.21 mm and 3.41,4.09,2.59 mm respectively.The time of single positioning was (3.4± 1.1) and (5.5 ± 3.1) min respectively (P=0.01).Conclusion Styrofoam has better positioning accuracy and efficiency compared with breast carrier.
作者 房建南 马玉家 石俊田 黄江华 吴秀秀 马爽 陈锦树 黄晓波 Fang Jianhui;Ma Yujia;Shi Juntian;Huang Jianghua;Wu Xiuxiu;Ma Shuang;Cheng Jinshu;Huang Xiaobo(Department of Radiation Oncology,Sun Yat Sian Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第5期369-372,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤/外科学 乳腺肿瘤4周强放射疗法 体位固定 摆位误差 Breast neoplasms/surgery Breast neoplasms/intensity-moclulated radiotherapy Position fixation Set-up error
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:185
  • 2黄晓波,蒋国樑,陈佳艺,陈兰飞,胡伟刚.乳腺癌调强放射治疗和常规切线野治疗的三维剂量学研究[J].癌症,2006,25(7):855-860. 被引量:64
  • 3林承光,李国文,林刘文,吴裕起,萧达宜,赵充,卢泰祥,崔念基.鼻咽癌适形调强放射治疗中计划靶体积不确定度的研究[J].癌症,2007,26(2):200-203. 被引量:10
  • 4Van Dongen J A, Voogd A C, Fentiman I S, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment Cancer 10801 trial [J]. J Nail Cancer Ins,2000,92(4) : 1143-1150.
  • 5Bjorn Z A, Mikael A R, Mikael K A. Optimized MLC-beam arrangements for tangential breast irradiation [J]. Radiother and Oncol, 2000,54 (2) : 209-212.
  • 6Solin L J, Chu J C H, Sontag M R, et al. Three-dimensional photon treatment planning of the intact breast[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1991,21 ( 1 ) : 193-203.
  • 7Moody A M, Mayles W P M, Bliss J M, et al. The influence of breast size on late radiation effects and association with radiotherapy dose inhomogeneity [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1994,33(1):106-112.
  • 8Van Limbergen E, Rijnders A, van der Schueren E, et al.Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer: a quantitative analysis of the influence of radiation dose, fractionation schedules and surgical treatment techniques on cosmetic results[J]. Radiother Oncol, 1989,16(2) : 253-267.
  • 9Taylor M, Perez C A, Halverson K, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995,31(3) : 753-764.
  • 10Kestin L L, Sharpe M B, Frazier R C, et al. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000,48(5) : 1559-1568.

共引文献198

同被引文献159

引证文献22

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部