期刊文献+

物质依赖障碍患者采取脑电生物反馈治疗的疗效分析

Efficacy Analysis of Patients with Substance Dependence Disorder Using EEG Biofeedback Therapy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨对物质依赖障碍患者应用脑电生物反馈治疗的效果及影响。方法方便选取该院于2015年11月—2018年6月收治的80例物质依赖障碍患者,随机分为对照组与观察组,各组40例。其中对照组予以常规治疗,观察组则在常规治疗基础下加以脑电生物反馈治疗措施。对比两组患者经治疗后的临床疗效及焦虑情绪的改善情况。结果观察组患者在经常规治疗的基础下加以脑电生物反馈治疗措施,其临床治疗总有效率为95.0%,对照组仅在常规治疗干预下,治疗总有效率仅为72.5%,观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(χ~2=5.600,P<0.05);两组患者经治疗后,汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分均有显著改善,其中经4、8周的治疗后观察组评分分别为(8.64±2.05)分、(6.27±2.17)分,对照组评分分别为(17.61±2.48)分、(14.39±1.26)分,观察组评分显著低于对照组(t=17.631,20.466;P<0.05)。结论对物质依赖障碍症患者的治疗过程中,在常规治疗的基础下,予以患者脑电生物反馈的治疗方式,可显著提升患者的治疗效率,并有效缓解其焦虑情绪,值得临床借鉴实施。 Objective To investigate the effect and influence of EEG biofeedback therapy in patients with substance dependence disorder. Methods 80 patients with substance-dependent disorders admitted to our hospital from November 2015 to June 2018 were convenient selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group received routine treatment, and the observation group received EEG biofeedback treatment under the conventional treatment. The clinical efficacy and anxiety of the two groups were compared after treatment. Results In the observation group, EEG biofeedback treatment was given on the basis of conventional treatment. The total effective rate of clinical treatment was 95.0%. In the control group, only the conventional treatment intervention was only 72.5%. The total observation group was only 77.5%. The effective rate was significantly higher than that of the control group(χ^2=5.600,P<0.05). After treatment, the Hamilton anxiety scale scores were significantly improved. The scores of the observation group were(8.64 ±2.05)points,(6.27 ±2.17)points after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the control group scores were(17.61 ±2.48)points,(14.39±1.26)points, respectively, and the observation group score was significantly lower than the control group(t=17.631, 20.466;P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of patients with substance dependence disorders, under the conventional treatment, the treatment of patients with EEG biofeedback can significantly improve the treatment efficiency of patients and effectively alleviate their anxiety. It is worthy of clinical implementation.
作者 侯占凤 HOU Zhan-feng(Department of Psychiatry, Linyi Mental Health Center, Linyi, Shandong Province, 276000 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2019年第7期87-89,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 脑电生物反馈 物质依赖障碍 临床价值 EEG biofeedback Substance dependence disorder Clinical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献91

  • 1王有德,张爱民.中药福康片的戒毒机理初探[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志,1996,2(3):8-10. 被引量:11
  • 2侯彩兰,李凌江.创伤后应激障碍和人格特征的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(4):256-258. 被引量:23
  • 3杜江,赵敏,谢斌.精神障碍与物质滥用的共病[J].国际精神病学杂志,2006,33(2):96-99. 被引量:8
  • 4赵艳红,阮金秀.牛黄及其代用品的药理作用及临床应用[J].军事医学科学院院刊,2007,31(2):175-178. 被引量:51
  • 5Fauerbach JA, Lawrence JW, Schmidt CW, et al. Personality predictiors of injury-ralated posttraumatic stress disorder [J] . J Nerv Mental Disc, 2000, 188: 510- 517.
  • 6Carlier IVE, Lambens RD, Gersons BPR. Risk factors for posttraumatic stress symptomatology in police offleers: a prospective analysis [J]. J Nerv Menlal Disc, 1997, 185 : 498-506.
  • 7Holeva V, Tarrier N. Personality and perttraumatic dissociation in the prediction of PTSD in victims of road traffic accidents [J] . J Psychosomatic Res, 2001, 51: 687- 692.
  • 8Bennett P, Owen RL, Koutsakis S, et al. Personality. Rocial context and cognitive predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder in myocardial infarction patients [ J ] . Psychol Health, 2002, 17: 489-500.
  • 9McFarlan AC. Avoidance and intrusion in posttraumatic stress disorder [J] . J Nerv Mental Disc, 1992, 180: 439-445.
  • 10Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P, et al. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress discorder in an urban population of young adults: Arch Gen Psychiatry youn adults [J] . Arch Gen Psychiatr, 1991, 48: 216-222.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部