摘要
Pelvic floor muscle exercise(PFME)is the most common con servative manageme nt for urinary incon tine nee(Ul)after radical prostatectomy(RP).However,whether the PFME guided by a therapist(G-PFME)can contribute to the recovery of urinary continenee for patients after RP is still controversial.We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of G-PFME on Ul after RP and to explore whether the additional preoperative G-PFME is superior to postoperative G-PFME alone.Literature search was con ducted on Cochra ne Library,Embase,Web of Scie nee,and PubMed,to obtai n all re leva nt randomized controlled trials published before March 1,2018.Outcome data were pooled and an a lyzed with Review Man ager 5.3 to compare the conti nence rates of G-PFME with control and to compare additional preoperative G-PFME with postoperative G-PFME.Twenty-two articles with 2647 patients were included.The conti nence rates of G?PFME were all superior to con trol at d iff ere nt follow-up time points,with the odds ratio(OR)(95%confidence interval[Cl])of 2.79(1.53-5.07),2.80(1.87-4.19),2.93(1.19-7.22),4.11(2.24-7.55),and 2.41(1.33-4.36)at 1 mon th,3 months,4 months,6 months,and 12 months after surgery,respectively.However,there was no difference between additional preoperative G-PFME and postoperative G-PFME,with the OR(95%Cl)of 1.70(0.56-5.11)and 1.35(0.41-4.40)at 1 month and 3 months after RP,respectively.G-PFME could improve the recovery of urinary continence at both early and Iong-term stages.Starting the PFME preoperatively might not produce extra benefits for patients at early stage,compared with postoperative PFME.
基金
a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71573097).
