期刊文献+

再论留置适用应遵循之基本原则与应有之司法衔接——以《刑事诉讼法》修正案为参照 被引量:3

A Further Discussion on the Basic Principles to Be Followed in the Application of Detention and the Judicial Cohesion——With Reference to the Amendments of the Criminal Procedure Law
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 2018年3月《监察法》出台后,"留置"取代"两规""两指"及职务犯罪侦查的部分刑事强制措施,整合党内纪律检查、行政监察与职务犯罪侦查职能,但因实践中启动条件的差异导致适用同一标准之留置有违比例原则。因此,立法应将留置之适用条件、方式及其限度依照比例原则作类型化处理,否则极易导致被留置人人身自由权利受到侵害。基于检察机关刑事司法审查职能,除审查起诉时对监察委调查证据合法性进行审查外,还应就留置适用合法性进行审查。由于修订后的《刑事诉讼法》保留检察机关有限自侦权,因此适用留置还是刑事强制措施决定于法律帮助权是否允许介入及因超期、违法限制人身自由引发的国家赔偿究竟由哪类主体承担。 After the promulgation of the “Supervision Law” in March 2018,“Detention” has replaced “two regulations”“two fingers” and some criminal coercive measures in the investigation of duty crimes,and has integrated the functions of discipline inspection,administrative supervision and investigation of duty crimes within the party.However,in practice,different starting conditions have led to violation of the principle of proportionality in the course of applying the same standard of detention.Legislation should classify the applicable conditions,methods and limits of detention according to the principle of proportionality,otherwise it will easily lead to infringement of the right in personal freedom to the detained person.Based on the functions of criminal justice review in the procurator department,in addition to reviewing the legality of evidence investigated by the supervisory committee during prosecution,it is also necessary to review the legality of detention.Since the revised Criminal Procedure Law retains the procurator department’s limited right of self-investigation,the application of detention or criminal coercive measures determines whether the legal aid right is allowed to intervene and which kind of subjects bear the state compensation caused by the extended and illegal restriction of personal freedom.
作者 王译 WANG Yi(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China)
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第6期22-29,共8页 Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"审判程序违法的类型化处理研究"(17BFX053) 最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点项目"刑事案件中电子证据的审查判断"(GJ2017B11) 国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心资助项目(教技函2013[26])
关键词 刑事强制措施 分工原则 比例原则 法律监督 羁押必要性审查 留置 监察法 刑事诉讼法 criminal coercive measures principle of division of labor principle of proportionality legal supervision review of the necessity of custody retention Supervision Law Criminal Procedure Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

共引文献1008

同被引文献52

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部