摘要
保证担保中,债务人转移财产、改变通讯方式并移居国外以逃避债务,或出现资产严重恶化、丧失信誉而影响偿还债务等情况时有发生,而现行的担保法律体系之下缺乏针对性的解决措施,已有手段亦效用有限,致使保证人成为替罪羔羊,权利无法得到有效保障。为此,学习域外相关实践与立法经验,探索保证人权利保障新路径——建立不安救济保障制度,在保证原始交易稳定的前提下最大程度维护保证人权利,这既是法意所在,亦是实践所需。
In the guarantee,debtors deliberately transfer the property,change the communication mode and emigrate abroad to avoid the debt,or the severe deterioration of assets and loss of credit that affect the repayment of the debts occurs frequently.However,there are no pertinent measures in the current guarantee legal system.Moreover,the existing means also lack effectiveness and hence the guarantors whose rights cannot be guaranteed became the scapegoats.Therefore,we should learn foreign related practice and legislative experience explore a new solution to human rights guarantee--establish an insecurity relief guarantee system.The guarantors’rights can be safeguarded to the maximum on the premise of ensuring the stability of original transaction.It is the need of both law and practice.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2018年第3期64-69,共6页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
保证担保
恶意逃债
权利保障
不安救济保障
guarantee
malicious evading debts
rights protection
insecurity relief guarantee
