论医疗过失的判断标准——解读《侵权责任法》第57条对医疗上注意义务的规定被引量：13

On the judgement standard in medical negligence: Interpreting Article 57 of the Tort Law about the doctors' duty of care in accordance

下载PDF

导出

摘要我国的《侵权责任法》第57条将医疗上的注意义务定义为"与当时的医疗水平相应的诊疗义务"。"当时"的医疗水平说明,随着医学技术的进步,医疗水平不是静止不变的,与此相应,医疗上的注意义务中包括执业后继续学习的义务。"医疗水平"受医疗的地域差距和医疗的专业性影响。"符合"医疗水平的诊疗并不必然是遵从常规的诊疗,法律要求行医者是合理慎重的医生,依据个案中的具体危险,比较衡量诊疗行为的危险性和治疗效果,采取避免结果发生的恰当诊疗措施。 According to Article 57 of the Tort Law of China, a doctor owes the duty of performing medical treatmentwhich should meet the current medical standards. The “current ” standards mean that with the development of medicaltechnique, the standards are not still, and therefore, a doctor should continue studying new knowledge and masteringnew skills. “The standards” may be defined in different ways because of the differences in access to medical resourcesand as well the differences in doctors’ specialties. “Meeting” the standards does not necessarily mean followingcustomary medical practice. A doctor should deliberately balance risks and benefits of the measures in issue and takealternative and proper measures in a specific case to avoid medical accidents.

作者于佳佳 YU Jiajia(Ko Guan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

机构地区上海交通大学凯原法学院

出处《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 2016年第3期61-69,共9页 Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基金教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"基本医疗服务保障法制化研究"(14JD025) 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题"医疗过失判断标准的比较法研究"(2014EFX001)

关键词医疗过失注意义务医疗水平医疗常规比较衡量 medical negligence duty of care medical standards customary practice balancing risks and benefits

分类号 DF36 [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Karl F. Laum U. Smentkowski.Arztliche Behandlungsfehler-Statut der Gutachtenkommision [M]. Koln: DeutscherAerzte-Verlag, 2005: 89.
2Karl Dupre. Arztliche Behandlungsfehler: Geschadigte Patientenund ihre Rechtsanspruche [M]. Wiesbaden: Jopp Francke R &Hart D 1 Aufl, 1989: 63.
3Comment, Recent developments: Medical specialties and thelocality rule [J]. Stan L Rev, 1962(14): 880.891.
4Page Keeton. Medical negligence-the standard of care [J]. Tex.Tech L Rev, 1979, 10(2): 351-370.
5稻垣乔. 判例评析[J]. 判例时代, 1995, 46(25): 56.69.
6手嶋丰. 判例评析[A].医事法判例百选[C].东京: 有斐阁,2006: 142-145.
7Beth Walston-Dunham. Medical malpractice law and litigation[M]. New York: Delmar Cengage Learning, 2005.
8Arvid Sieber. Strafrechtliche Grenzen arztlicher Therapiefreiheit[M]. New York: Springer, 1983: 37.
9余明永. 医疗损害赔偿纠纷[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010: 13.
10陈俊华.判定护理过失的基本标准分析[J].政法论丛,2013(6):86-92. 被引量：2