1Zhao W, Rowlands JA. X - ray imaging using amorphous seleniun,feasibility of a flat panel self - scanned detector for digital radiology. Med phy, 1995, 23(10): 1595 ～ 1604.
2Shaw CC, Wang TP, Breitenstein DS, et al. Improvement of signalto - noise and contrast - to - noise ratios in dual screen computed radiography. Med Phys, 1997, 24(8): 1293 ～ 1302.
3Leblans P. A new needle -cryglalline computed radiography dector. J Digit Imaging, 2000, 13 (2 supply 1 ): 117 ～ 120.
4Artz DS. computed radiography for the radiological technologist.Semin Roenatgenol, 1997, 32 ( 1 ): 12 ～ 24.
5Launders J H,Cowen A R,Bury R F,et al.Towords image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography [J].Eur.Radiol, 2001,11 (2) : 870-875.
6Sinead E P,Patrick C B.Digital radiography:are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index[J]. Eur Radiol, 2002,12 (12) : 2381-2387.
7Samei E, Flynn M J.An experimental comparision of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems[J].Med Phys, 2003,30(3 ) : 608-622.
8Neitzel U, Maack I, Gunther-Kohfahl S.Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector[J].Med Phys, 1994, 21(2):509-516.
9Goo JM, Lm JG, Kim JH, et al. Digital chest radiography with a selenium- based flat- panel detector versus astorage phosphor system: comparison of soft - copy images[J]. A JR, 2000, 175 (4) : 1013 - 1018.
10Lucia JM, Woutor ,IH, Bart JA, et al. Comparison of light different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simu - lated chest disease[J]. AJR, 2005, 185 (2): 339 -340.
