期刊文献+

博乐欣与地西泮治疗焦虑症的对照研究 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of Venlafaxine and Diazepamun in the Trcatment of Patients with Anxiety Neurosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 比较博乐欣与地西泮治疗焦虑症的疗效和副反应。方法 将58例符合CCMD-2—R诊断标准的焦虑症患者,随机分为博乐欣组(29例),地西泮组(29例)共治疗6周。采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和副反应量表(TESS)评价疗效和副反应。结果 博乐欣与地西泮治疗焦虑症均有效,且两者疗效相当,博乐欣副反应明显少于地西泮。结论 博乐欣是治疗焦虑症安全、有效的药物。 To compare the efficacy and side effects of venlafaxive and cliazepamum on patients with anxiety neurosis. Methods Fifty eight patients met the criteria of CCMD - 2 - R for anxiety neu-rosis were assigned randomly to venlafaxine or diazepamum treatment for 6 weeks. Efficacy and side effects were assessed with HAMA, SAS and TESS. Results Both drugs were similar efficient in treating anxiety neurosis. However venlafaxine had fewer side effects than diazepamum. Conclusions Venlafaxine is a safe and efficient drug in treating anxiety neurosis.
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2002年第4期220-221,共2页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
关键词 博乐欣 地西泮 焦虑症 疗效 副作用 对比分析 Venlafaxine Diazepamum Anxiety neurosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1陈佐明,胡宪章,张迎黎,张建宏.丁螺环酮与地西泮治疗焦虑症双盲比较[J].中国新药与临床杂志,1998,17(2):99-100. 被引量:18
  • 2李焕德.抗抑郁新药顽发克星[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),1995,22(3):165-169. 被引量:45
  • 3Bakish D.The patient with comorbid depression and anxiety:the unmet need[J].J Clin Psychiatry,1999,60(Sup):20-24.
  • 4Davidson JR,Dupont RJ,Hedges D,et al.Efficacy,safety adtolerability of venlafaxine extended release and buspirone in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder[J].J Clin Psychiatry,1999,60:528-529.

二级参考文献2

  • 1徐济民,临床实用新药手册,1996年,146页
  • 2团体著者,中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准(第2版),1995年,79页

共引文献60

同被引文献1

  • 1Barish D. The patient with comorbid depression and anxiety: the unmet need[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 1999,60:20

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部