摘要
国家主席习近平自2013年提出"一带一路"倡议,全球媒体近五年来一直持续关注,随着"一带一路"建设的推进,一些国家的认知和态度也在悄然发生变化。本文基于Lexis Nexis新闻数据库,以2013年9月至2017年12月《纽约时报》《印度时报》和《欧盟报》有关"一带一路"的报道为语料,综合运用五层次话语政治分析框架以及三角测量法、语料库语言学、评价理论等方法定性和定量考察这些媒体对"一带一路"话语建构的差异、情感态度变化及其原因。研究发现,《纽约时报》通过对其他国家隐性评价表达美国的反对立场,体现了"重大机遇"、"害怕失去霸主地位"、"机遇"、"威胁"的暧昧态度;《印度时报》对"一带一路"认知经历了印度"不情愿加入"、"有可能获益"、"仍然谨慎观望"三个阶段;《欧盟报》经历了从总体支持、到欧盟各国争相加入、再到支持态度逐渐具体化的转变。这一研究成果为我国对外话语的差异化和精准化传播提供了实证依据,有助于我国有效应对国外舆情,从而进一步提升"一带一路"国际话语权、对外话语构建能力和国际影响力。
After President Xi Jinping put forward the Belt and Road Initiative（ BRI） in 2013,there is much media coverage on it since then and gradual attitudinal change in those key countries. This paper,based on the Lexis Nexis Belt and Road Initiative data from The New York Times,The Times of India and European Union News during September 2013 to December 2017,within the theoretical framework of triangulation,corpus linguistics and appraisal theory,makes quantitative and qualitative analyses on the construction of the Belt and Road in terms of discursive features,attitudes and its reasons. Findings demonstrate that historically the three newspapers showed different degrees of concern and changes regarding BRI. The New York Times implicitly reveals its negative attitude,representing BRI as a great opportunity,fear of losing the hegemony,opportunity and threat; The Times of India explicitly states Indian government＇s cold attitude,reluctance to join,possibly beneficiary,and remaining wary; European Union News at the beginning gives the general support to BRI,followed by the individual countries＇ will to join and the specified details about the implementation of the BRI. This research provides empirical evidence for Chinese media＇s differentiated and targeted communication,which may be helpful to enhance the discourse power in handling international relations.
出处
《外语教学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期31-35,共5页
Foreign Language Education
关键词
“一带一路”倡议
国外媒体
语料库方法
语义韵
话语政治
The Belt and Road Initiative
foreign media
corpus-based analysis
semantic prosody
discourse politics
