摘要
目的分析静脉应用胺碘酮对快速心律失常的治疗效果及不良反应情况。方法选择本院2015年2月至2018年1月收治的98例快速心律失常患者为研究对象,根据治疗方法分为A组和B组,各49例。A组给予静脉应用胺碘酮治疗,B组给予静脉应用普罗帕酮治疗。比较两组血压、心率、治疗效果及不良反应情况。结果治疗后,两组患者血压、心率均显著降低,且A组低于B组(P<0.05)。A组的不良反应总发生率显著低于B组,治疗总有效率显著高于B组(P<0.05)。结论快速心律失常患者行静脉应用胺碘酮治疗可取得较好的治疗效果,减少不良反应,值得临床推广。
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect and adverse reaction of intravenous amiodarone in the treatmentof rapid arrhythmia. Methods Ninety-eight patients with rapid arrhythmias treated in our hospital from February 2015 toJanuary 2018 were selected as the study objects and divided into group A and groupB according to the different treatmentmethods, with 49 cases in each group. The group A was treated with intravenous amiodarone and the group B was treatedwith intravenous propafenone. The blood pressure, heart rates, therapeutic effects and adverse reactions were comparedbetween the two groups. Results After treatment, the blood pressure and heart rate of the two groups were lower than thosebefore treatment, and those of the group A were lower than the groupB（P〈0.05）. The total incidence of adverse reactions inthe group A was significantly lower than that in the group B, and the total effective rate of treatment was significantly higherthan that in the groupB （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Intravenous amiodarone in the treatment of rapid arrhythmia can achieveabetter therapeutic effect and reduce adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者
白成斌
郭亚妮
BAI Cheng-bin;GUO Ya-ni(Shenhua Shendong General Hospital of Shenmu County,Yulin 719315,China)
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2018年第25期31-32,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
胺碘酮
快速心律失常
心率
amiodarone
rapid arrhythmia
heart rate
