期刊文献+

NEWS评分、qSOFA评分、SIRS评分对急诊感染性疾病患者预后评估价值的对比研究 被引量:12

The comparative study of NEWS score,qSOFA score and SIRS score in evaluating prognosis of patiens of infectious diseases in emergency department
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较早期预警评分(NEWS)、快速脓毒症相关器官功能障碍评分(qSOFA)和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分对感染性疾病患者预后的评估价值。方法选择2016年6月至2017年6月就诊于我院急诊的412例感染性疾病患者作为研究对象。收集患者的一般临床资料,记录就诊后生命体征,进行NEWS评分、qSOFA评分和SIRS评分,根据患者28天预后情况分为死亡组和存活组,分析3种评分与患者预后的相关性,应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估3种评分对预后的评估价值,并进行比较。结果 NEWS评分、qSOFA评分和SIRS评分分值越高,死亡危险越高;NEWS评分、qSOFA评分和SIRS评分的ROC曲下面积分别为0.750、0.792和0.723。结论 NEWS评分、qSOFA评分和SIRS评分对急诊感染性疾病预后评估存在临床价值,且3种评分中qSOFA评分的评估价值最高。 Objective To evaluatethe value of national early warning score(NEWS),quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment(qSOFA)score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome(SIRS)score in predicting the prognosis in patients with infectious diseases of emergency department.Methods A total of 412 patients diagnosed with infectious diseases and treated in the emergency department of our hospital from June 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled in this study.The general clinical data and vital signs of patients were collected;NEWS,qSOFA and SIRS score were counted;the patients were divided into death and survival groups according to the outcomes.The correlation between the 3 scores and the prognosis of the patients were analyzed.The area under the ROC curve was used to evaluate the value of these three scores in predicting prognosis of patients.Results The higher score of NEWS score,qSOFA score and SIRS score,the higher mortality of patients;Area under the ROC curve of NEWS score,qSOFA score and SIRS score were 0.750,0.792 and 0.723,respectively.Conclusion NEWS score,qSOFA score and SIRS score are useful in evaluating prognosis of patients of infectious diseases in emergency department.Moreover,among the three methods,the qSOFA score is the best one to evaluate the prognosis of infectious diseases.
作者 王子琪 刘志强 祝亭亭 梁璐 Wang Ziqi;Liu Zhiqiang;Zhu Tingting;Liang Lu(Hebeiuniversity,Baoding 071000,China;Department of Emergency,2.Affiliated Hospital of Hebeiuniversity,Baoding 071000,China)
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 2018年第6期482-485,共4页 Clinical Focus
关键词 感染 英国国家早期预警评分 快速脓毒症相关器官功能障碍评分 全身炎症反应综合征评分 infection national early warning score (XEWS) quick sopsis relared organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score systemic inflammotory response syndrome (SIRS) score
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1孟新科,杨径,吴华雄,朱虹,郑晓英,魏刚,刘德红,苏顺庭.MEWS与APACHEⅡ评分在急诊潜在危重病患者病情评价和预后预测中的对比研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2005,9(8):1-4. 被引量:160
  • 2许宝华,杨国斌,孙海晨,吴学豪,毛琦敏,聂时南,唐文杰.再造新型急诊医疗服务流程的研究和实践[J].医学研究生学报,2006,19(12):1110-1112. 被引量:12
  • 3Sacobs S, Zuleika M, Mphansa T, et al. The multiple dysfunction score as a descriptor of patient outcome in septic shock: compared with two other scoring system [J]. Crit Care Med, 1999,27 : 741-744.
  • 4Malone D L, Kuhls D, Napolitano L M, et al. Back to basics., validation of the admission systemic inflammatory response syndrome score in predicting outcome in trauma[J]. J Trauma,2001,51(3) :458-463.
  • 5Bone R C, Balk R A,Cerra F B, et al. The ACCP/SCCM Consenus Conference Committee: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 1992, 20:864,.
  • 6Yoshimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hoya K. Acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome in subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Stroke,2001,32(9) :1989-1993.
  • 7Hage Y, Beppa T. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction following gastro intestinal surgery[J]. Crit Care Med, 1997, 25: 1994- 2000.
  • 8孙红,绳宇,周文华.急诊分诊标准探讨[J].护理研究(中旬版),2007,21(10):2709-2710. 被引量:25
  • 9Goldhill DR, Worthington L, Mulcahy A, et al. The patient-at-risk team : identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients [ J]. Anaesthesia, 1999,54 (9) : 853-60.
  • 10Kellett J, Deane B. The simple clinical score predicts mortality for 30 days after admission to an acute medical unit [ J]. QJM,2006, 99 (11) : 771-781.

共引文献72

同被引文献118

引证文献12

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部