期刊文献+

教育与主观社会地位——基于地位寻求理论的实证分析 被引量:7

Education and Subjective Social Status:An Empirical Analysis Based on Status Seeking Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 教育不仅能提升个人社会地位,而且对家庭的社会地位亦有不可小觑的作用。因此,近些年中国家庭子女教育支出的攀比趋势越发明显。采用中国家庭追踪调查数据2010、2012、2014年数据,对面板有序Probit模型进行估计,结果表明:个人受教育年限对个人主观社会地位具有正向显著影响;参照组平均教育年限对个人主观社会地位具有负向显著影响;个人教育年限的交互项对个人主观社会地位具有正向作用,表明教育水平越高,越不易受到社会比较的负面影响。研究证实了教育的位置性特征对主观社会地位具有显著影响。 Education not only has a lifting effect on personal social status,but also has the same substantial effect on family social status,thus in recent years the comparison trend of educational expenditure which is spent for children in a family is becoming much more obvious in China.This research applies panel ordered Probit model to CFPS data in three years:2010,2012 and 2014.The empirical analysis reveals that years of personal education have significantly positive effect on personal subjective social status;the average years of education in reference group have significantly negative effect on personal subjective social status; the interactive item of educational years have significantly positive effect on personal subjective social status,this indicates that when a person's educational years are much longer,he or she will be less vulnerable to the negative influence from social comparison.Our research reveals that the positionality of education has significant effect on subjective social status.
作者 张亮 杭斌 ZHANG Liang;HANG Bin(School of Statistics,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,Chin)
出处 《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第8期85-93,共9页 Journal of Statistics and Information
关键词 教育 主观社会地位 地位寻求 位置性 面板有序Probit模型 education subjective social status status seeking positionality panel ordered Probit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1陈利平.高增长导致高储蓄:一个基于消费攀比的解释[J].世界经济,2005,28(11):3-9. 被引量:63
  • 2Campbell, John Y. & Cocco, Joao F. , 2007. How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data [ J ]. Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), 591 -621, April.
  • 3Frank, R. H., 1985b. The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods [ J ]. American Economic review, Vol. 75 : 101 - 16.
  • 4Easterlin, R. A. , 1995. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? [ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 27 : 35 - 47.
  • 5Weiss, Y. and C. Fershman, 1998. Social status and Economic Performance: A Survey [ J ]. European Economic Review, Vol. 42 : 801 - 820.
  • 6Shang-Jin Wei and Xiaobo Zhang, 2012. Status Competition and Housing Prices: Some Evidence from China [ J ]. NBER Working Paper No. 18000, April.
  • 7Duesenberry, J. S, 1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • 8Layard, R., 1980. Human Satisfactions and Public Policy[ J]. Economic Journal, Vol. 90:735 - 750.
  • 9Robson, A. J. , 1992. Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk [ J ]. Econometrica, Vol. 60:837 -857.
  • 10Hopkins, E. and T. Kornienko, 2004a. Running to keep in the same place: Consumer choice as a game of status [ J]. American Economic Review, Vol. 94:1085 - 1107.

共引文献36

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部