期刊文献+

欧盟税改与国际税收发展新出路——针对互联网巨头跨国避税问题的分析 被引量:22

EU Tax Reform and the New Direction of International Tax Development——An Analysis of Transnational Tax Avoidance for Internet Giant
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着数字经济的飞速发展,互联网开始日益深入全球各个领域,互联网企业跨国避税的问题也日益严重。本文从数字经济背景下美国互联网巨头所采取的避税策略出发,深入分析了欧盟针对这些跨国避税问题所采取的一系列税制改革措施以及可能遇到的障碍,并在此基础上与美国特朗普"减税"改革进行比较分析,最后提出了欧盟税改对于我国的一些启示。本文指出,跨国避税所采取的主要方式是转让定价和规避常设机构的构架,而欧盟对此已经采取的策略主要有完善电子商务增值税政策、重启合并企业税税基(CCCTB)计划、发布针对数字企业的公平征税提案等系列政策。通过比较分析发现欧美截然不同的税制改革方向都是从维护自身利益角度出发、争夺国际税收主导权的必然选择。我国也应借鉴国际经验,积极应对数字经济大潮的冲击,立足本国国情,完善互联网税制、加强反避税工作。 With the rapid development of digital economy, the internet has increasingly penetrated into all kinds of field around the world, and transnational tax avoidance of internet company is becoming more and more serious. Under the background of digital economy and based on the tax avoidance strategy adopted by the US internet giants, this paper discussed a series of tax reform measures that the EU put forward to avoid international tax avoidance and the possible obstacles to implement them. On this basis, we compared the "tax reduction" of America. And then we got some inspirations for our country from the EU tax reform. In this article, we pointed out that the main strategy for transnational corporation to avoid tax is to transfer pricing and to avoid the frame of permanent body. To solve this problem, the EU has improved the policies of improving e-commerce value-added tax, restarting the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base(CCCTB) plan and proposing new measures to ensure that all companies pay fair tax in the EU. Through comparative analysis, it is found that the opposite direction of tax reform in Europe and the United States is the inevitable choice to safeguard their own interests and to compete for the international tax dominance. As for China, based on the fundamental realities of the country, it is significant to improve the mechanism of e-commerce tax and to pay more attention to anti-tax avoidance by drawing experience from international practice.
作者 白彦锋 湛雨潇 Bai Yanfeng;Zhan Yuxiao
出处 《公共财政研究》 2018年第2期4-15,共12页 Public Finance Research Journal
关键词 数字经济 互联网巨头 跨国避税 欧盟税改 Digital Economy Internet Gaint Transnational Tax Avoidance EU Tax Reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献37

  • 1周仁庆,罗骁莉.增值税面临的电子商务问题和国际组织提出的解决意见[J].涉外税务,2001(4):18-20. 被引量:3
  • 2张志勇,王晓悦.经济全球化与我国国际税收管理体系的创建[J].税务研究,1999(10):3-9. 被引量:16
  • 3经济合作与发展组织 国家税务总局国际税务司(译).《OECD税收协议范本注释》[M].中国税务出版社,..
  • 4唐腾翔.《国际税收协定通论》[M].中国财政经济出版社,..
  • 5贺连堂,王晓悦,孙毅敏.美国葛兰素史克公司转让定价案分析[J].涉外税务,2007(10):61-63. 被引量:4
  • 6the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) of the U.S.Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee,2013-05-21,EXHIBIT 1a-Subcommittee Memo on Offshore Profit Shifting on Apple.(http://www.levin.senate.gov/newsroom/speeches/speech/opening-statement-ofsen-carl-levin-offshore-profit-shifting-and-the-us-tax-code-part-2-appleinc).
  • 7Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),2013-02,Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting report.(http://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps.htm).
  • 8Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),2013-07,Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.(http://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps.htm).
  • 9CLARK,W.S.,2007,Tax Policy for Investment,Journal of Tax Research,5(2).
  • 10中国国际税收研究会.世界税收发展研究报告(2011).中国税务出版社.2012.

共引文献112

同被引文献222

引证文献22

二级引证文献258

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部