摘要
有关法兰克时期政治体制的讨论,始于文艺复兴晚期。受当时人文主义影响,法国学者以历史批判视角剔除了过往叙述中的神话色彩。论战延续至18世纪启蒙时代,思想界分为贵族派与王权派,双方观点对立,但均以古代政体的历史为依据,为自身合法性辩护。此后,受18世纪中叶政治局势的影响,启蒙思想中的公意和理性观念渗入论战,使其日趋激化。随着第三等级的介入,历史的合法性逐渐让位于公意与理性,以致历史本身的权威性最终遭到全面否定。这场论战开启了法国革命激进主义的序幕,并为推翻旧制度提供了丰富的思想与话语资源。
Discussion of the Frankish political system began in the late Renaissance.Influenced by the humanism of the times,French scholars adopted the methods of historical criticism to expunge the mythical elements from previous narratives.The debate continued into the 18th century enlightenment,when thinkers of the time divided into aristocratic and royalist camps.The two sides held opposing views,but each defended its legitimacy on the basis of the history of antiquity.Thereafter,affected by the political developments of the mid-18th century,the debate was colored by enlightenment ideas of reason and the general will,making the divisions sharper.As the Third Estate entered the debate,the idea of historical legitimacy gradually yielded to enlightenment ideas of reason and the general will,ultimately resulting in the comprehensive rejection of the authority of history itself.The debate served as a prelude to the radicalism of the French revolution,providing rich intellectual and discourse resources for the overthrowing of the old system.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期177-203,共27页
Social Sciences in China
基金
国家社科基金项目"法国大革命时期的图像与政治文化研究"(16BSS045)的资助
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"法国启蒙运动和大革命研究青年创新团队"的阶段性成果
